Answer:
1/3
Step-by-step explanation:
Divide the numerator and denominator by 6.
6/18 = 1/3
Answer:
She used inductive reasoning. (False)
She used the law of detachment. (True)
Her conclusion is valid. (True)
The statements can be represented as "if p, then q and if q, then r." (False)
Her conclusion is true. (True)
Step-by-step explanation:
p = Two lines are perpendicular
q = They intersect at Right angles.
Given: A and B are perpendicular
Conclusion: A and B intersect at right angle.
According to the law of detachment, There are two premises (statements that are accepted as true) and a conclusion. They must follow the pattern as shown below.
Statement 1: If p, then q.
Statement 2: p
Conclusion: q
In our case the pattern is followed. The truth of the premises logically guarantees the truth of the conclusion. So her conclusion is true and valid.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
as you see the top "moves" like
2,4,6,8, and next will be 10
the bottom adds 3 to the previos answer
5,8,11,14, next will be 15
5th card is 10/15
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Sinking Fund: Expenses like these are predictable. You know exactly when they’re going to come due, and you know at least approximately how much they’re going to cost"
So we have: down payment for a car, saving to start a business, saving for a college education
2. Rainy-Day Fund: unexpected expense you have to pay,
So we have: plumbing expenses, paying to fix a broken air conditioner, unexpected travel expense, plumbing expenses
Answer:
M=30 degrees
because 102+148=150 and 180-150=30. (remember the sum of a triangle is 180 degrees)
the congruence statement would be SAS (side angle side) because 102 and 48 are the same in both triangles, but the third side is not the same.
