1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andreas93 [3]
3 years ago
12

Today, federal laws are enacted by Congress, enforced by the President, and interpreted by the Supreme Court. This is similar to

which philosopher’s ideals of government?
A.
Aristotle
B.
Montesquieu
C.
Machiavelli
D.
Smith
History
1 answer:
lubasha [3.4K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Montesquieu

Explanation:

PLATO

You might be interested in
Which statement best represents the teachings of Legalism?
allochka39001 [22]

Answer:

Legalism relies on the use of strict laws and harsh punishments to control people’s behavior

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who invented transformers
hichkok12 [17]

mate but I think it was human then they got conscience and then started building themselves

6 0
2 years ago
Please select all of the things below that are the Cons (bad things) of Mercantilism.
Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

Products would often be more expensive in the colonies due to lack of competition

And

It encouraged smuggling and the breaking of other restrictive laws

Explanation:

hope this helps :)

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ellis island served as
dmitriy555 [2]

Answer:

Ellis Island is a historical site that opened in 1892 as an immigration station, a purpose it served for more than 60 years until it closed in 1954. Located at the mouth of Hudson River between New York and New Jersey, Ellis Island saw millions of newly arrived immigrants pass through its doors

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Based on what you know of the situation, what arguments could be made against holding suspects without allowing for a proper tri
Naddik [55]

The correct answer is: violation of individual liberties, and the violation of the national and international laws.


As much as the government has plausible for doing it so, as we look back at the history of terrorist attacks, the government would argue the indefinite detention without, considering it aa form of prevention. If we know the human rights we will realize the most viable and obvious argument for being against that type of detention is the violation of national and international laws about the individual liberties. That's when there is no evidence of crime and when the individual does not represent national threat. It may be controversial the way government tries to deal with issues like that, but international organizations has made very clear their points about

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • During the revolutionary war, a massachusetts group of women accused a merchant of hoarding coffee. the group took matters into
    11·1 answer
  • Why was Common Law important?
    15·2 answers
  • Latin settlers __________ Rome on hills along the Tiber River
    14·1 answer
  • In the united state before the civic war, it was illegal to
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a difficulty faced by the Ottoman empire in the 1700s and 1800s? 
    13·2 answers
  • How can citizens directly contribute to the common good by fulfilling their civic responsibilities
    15·1 answer
  • Two functions of WHO.​
    12·1 answer
  • 4. During what process does ammonia (NH3) convert to nitrate ions (NO3)- ?
    5·1 answer
  • What was a result of the fighting at Lexington and Concord?
    13·1 answer
  • Help please fast i got to get a 90%
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!