What is 10+10 hmmmmmmmm
1 answer:
You might be interested in
The smaller the angle subtended by a side, the smaller the length of the
side.
The correct responses are;
Question 1: The list of sides from shortest to longest are;
- MO/Shortest MO/Medium and MO/Longest
a) <u>Friday</u>
b) <u>70 minutes</u>
c) <u>40%</u>
d) Yes<u>,</u> <u>the sum of the </u><u>mean</u><u> number of </u><u>minutes spent</u><u> on </u><u>aerobic</u><u> training and the mean number of minutes spent on </u><u>strength</u><u> training is equal to the mean </u><u>total</u><u> number of minutes spent </u><u>training.</u>
From the given diagram, we have, the measure of the third angle, ∠O, is
found as follows;
∠O = 180° - 54° - 61° = 65°
Therefore, ∠O = The largest angle
We get;
The longest side is opposite the largest angle, which gives;
The shortest side is the side opposite ∠N (54°)=
The next shortest side is the side opposite ∠M(61°) =
The longest side is the side opposite ∠O(65°) =
a) The time spent training on Tuesday = 60 + 10 = 70 minutes
The time spent training on Thursday = 50 + 30 = 80 minutes
The time spent training on Friday = 45 + 40 = 85 minutes
Therefore, the day the athlete spent the longest total amount of time training is on <u>Friday</u>
b) The time spent training on Monday = 10 + 20 = 30 minutes
The time spent training on Wednesday = 20 + 15 = 35 minutes
Therefore, we get;
30, 35, 70, 80, and 85
The median total number of minutes the athlete spent training each day = <u>70 minutes</u>
<u />
c) The time spent strength training = 20 + 10 + 15 + 30 + 45 = 120
The total number of minutes the athlete spent training = 70 + 80 + 85 + 30 + 35 = 300
=
×
%
d) The mean number of minutes spent on strength training is found as follows;
The mean number of minutes spent on aerobic training is found as follows;
The mean total number of minutes spent training, =
= 60
Therefore;
Learn more here:
Answer:
a) not proportional
b) proportional; k =
Step-by-step explanation:
a) for any proportional equation, the line must pass through the origin. The equation in a) is y = 4x + 1, and the '+1' is the y-intercept. This means that the line does not pass through the origin, so x and y cannot increase by the same amount (i.e. they are not proportional).
Another way to determine this is is to use the y = kx base. If you have an equation that fits that it's likely proportional.
Here, if the equation was only y = 4x then it'd be proportional because u can see that k = 4. This is not the equation though, and the 4x + 1 doesn't fit to the y = kx formula so it can't be proportional.
b) straight away you can see that there's no 'c' term (y = mx + c) which means the y-intercept is 0, so the line passes through the origin. While this does not immediately mean the line is proportional, you can make sure that it is by checking it fits with the y = kx equation.
y = -(3/5)x fits with y = kx, with k being -3/5