An investor who owns stocks in many different companies would most likely see a rise in the overall value of her portfolio during a _____.
bull market
Answer:
(A) $5,131.5
(B) $12,729.5
Explanation:
The interest earned on the value of interest earned before is the compounded interest. Compounding is the reinvestment of the amount earned before and take return over it too.
As per given data
Invested amount = $5,000
Interest rate = 3.9%
Interest is compounded monthly
Monthly rate = 3.9% / 12 = 0.325%
Formula for the accumulated amount of investment
A = P ( 1 + r )^n
Accumulated Money when $5,000 is
(A) Invested for 8 months
A = $5,000 ( 1 + 0.325% ) ^8
A = $5,131.5
(b) Invested for 24 years or 288 months (24 x 12)
A = $5,000 ( 1 + 0.325% ) ^288
A = $12,729.5
Answer:
A. $5.00 per machine-hour
Explanation:
The computation of the manufacturing overhead application rate is shown below:
= Estimated manufacturing overhead ÷ expected machine-hours incurred
= $550,000 ÷ 110,000 machine hours
= $5.00 per machine hour
In order to determine the manufacturing overhead application rate, basically we divided the estimated manufacturing overhead by the expected machine hours
Answer:
- <em><u>Command Economy</u></em>
A command economy is an economic system where the government has control over the production and pricing of goods and services. Sometimes called a planned economy, in a command economy, the government decides which goods and services to produce, the production and distribution method, and the prices of goods and services. The government is the central planner.
- The government has control over a command or planned economy.
- In mixed economies, the government has some control, while the rest is up to supply and demand.
- Command economies are characterized by large surpluses and shortages, monopolies, and prices set by the government.
- Mixed economies are characterized by corporate profitability, the use of fiscal and monetary policies to stimulate growth, and the existence of a public and private sector. 《♡♡♡♡》
Explanation:
Hope it helps JOIN《Æ §QŮÅĐ》
Answer:
This was an actual court case that ended in the Court of Appeals of the First District of California. Initially a lower court had ruled against the Sharabianlous and set extremely high compensations for damages to Berenstein. I do not understand why the court did it since it was proven that the land was contaminated and couldn't be sold under unless cleaned.
Finally, the court of appeals ruled in favor of the Sharabianlous, not because they thought they were right, but due to errors in the original trial.
The big issue in this case was that the contract signed by the Sharabianlous wasn't clear enough about what would happen if the land was not suitable for sale and they also failed to seek a lawyer when the contamination issues became obvious. If you read the case, even the real estate broker acted against the Sharabianlous when the property was appraised since he didn't tell the appraiser about the contamination issues.
The final ruling was made in 2010, 8 years after the parties engaged in the transaction, which gives us an idea of how complicated things can get when legal procedures are not followed, even though the outcome should be obvious.
If I was part of a jury and the case was about property that couldn't be sold due to contamination, I would probably vote in favor of the buyer, not the seller. It's common sense, but sometimes it you do not follow the appropriate legal path, common sense makes no sense at all.
