First, tan(<em>θ</em>) = sin(<em>θ</em>) / cos(<em>θ</em>), so if cos(<em>θ</em>) = 3/5 > 0 and tan(<em>θ</em>) < 0, then it follows that sin(<em>θ</em>) < 0.
Recall the Pythagorean identity:
sin²(<em>θ</em>) + cos²(<em>θ</em>) = 1
Then
sin(<em>θ</em>) = -√(1 - cos²(<em>θ</em>)) = -4/5
and so
tan(<em>θ</em>) = (-4/5) / (3/5) = -4/3
The remaining trig ratios are just reciprocals of the ones found already:
sec(<em>θ</em>) = 1/cos(<em>θ</em>) = 5/3
csc(<em>θ</em>) = 1/sin(<em>θ</em>) = -5/4
cot(<em>θ</em>) = 1/tan(<em>θ</em>) = -3/4
This question includes some misspelled words; here is the correct question:
Which point of view is most likely to be unreliable in a story?
All points of view in a story are equally reliable.
The first person narrator is most likely to be unreliable.
All points of view in a story are equally unreliable.
The third-person point of view is most likely to be unreliable.
The correct answer is The first-person narrator is most likely to be unreliable.
Explanation:
In a narrative text, an unreliable narrator implies the narrator lies on purpose to the reader, or his/her version of the story is not completely accurate. This feature of narration occurs mainly if the story, novel, etc. includes a first-person narrator. This is because in a first-person narrator, the thoughts, feelings, and point of view of one of the characters prevail, and this causes the events told are subjective and therefore more likely to be inaccurate. Also, this does not occur if there is a third-person narrator because in this case the narrator acts as an observer and this makes it more objective.
I think what you are looking for is 5x=300 therefore x=60 so at 60cars he would start to make more.
B. F2. That is the deepest point in the decline.
