All categories

2 years ago

Give an example of an official in public service who failed to show probity, and explain your

Business

1 answer:

Sedbober [7]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The perfect and perhaps most commonly known is former U.S. President Richard Nixon.

Explanation:

Nixon was President of the United States from 1969 to 1974, he was elected for two periods, but he only finished one and less than half the other one. The reason is that he was embroiled in the Watergate scandal: an espionage campaign of the Democratic Party from Republican officials, including Nixon himself.

With these acts, Nixon, as the highest public official in the nation, failed to show probity, and dishonored the office of the president. He was quick to renounce the presidency, and would have faced legal challenges if not for his Vice President, Gerald Ford, who became president as his replacement, and issued him a presidential pardon immediately after.

You might be interested in

5. A man has $ 10,000 to invest. He invests $ 4000 at 5 % and $ 3500 at 4 %. In order to have a yearly income of $ 500, he must

Len [333]

6.4%

200 from the 5% of 4000
140 from 4% on 3500

160 on 6.4% on 2500

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Pamela, a 1/3 partner, has an adjusted basis of $100,000 for her partnership interest. If Pamela sells her entire partnership in

creativ13 [48]

Answer: Capital gain = $10,000 ; Ordinary income = $25,000

Explanation:

Here is the complete question:

The PLM Partnership balance sheet includes the following assets on December 31 of the current year:

Basis FMV

Cash $230,000 $230,000

Accounts receivable 0 75000

Land 70,000 100,000

Total $300,000 $405,000

Pamela, a 1/3 partner, has an adjusted basis of $100,000 for her partnership interest. If Pamela sells her entire partnership interest to Emma for $135,000 cash, how much capital gain and ordinary income must Pamela recognize from the sale?

The following can be calculated based on the question above:

Pamela's share of the unrealized receivables will be the ordinary income which will be the unrealized receivables of $75000 which is then multiplied by 1/3 which is the interest. This will be:

Ordinary income = 1/3 × $75,00

= $25,000

The capital gain will be the difference that occurs between total gain and ordinary income.

Total gain difference

= $135,000 - $100,000

= $35,000

Ordinary Income = $25,000

Capital gain = $35,000 - $25,000

= $10,000

5 0

3 years ago

Christopher, an accounts manager at a mid-sized health care firm, does not have any direct international responsibilities; howev

monitta

Answer:

better understanding how foreign operations affect the company's competitive advantage.

Explanation:

Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that Christopher would greatly benefit by better understanding how foreign operations affect the company's competitive advantage. Mostly due to the fact that it would allow Christopher to determine certain aspects or scenarios that the company may not realize and maybe help him climb in the ranks.

7 0

3 years ago

The new growth theory states that A. technological advances are the responsibility of the government. B. the subsistence level i

EleoNora [17]

Answer:

C. technological advances are the result of discoveries and choices.

Explanation:

The new growth theory was developed by a man named med Paul Romer. This new growth theory stresses the role which is determined by human choices.

The new growth theory states that technological advances are the result of discoveries and choices, rather than random choices. It explains the fact that new innovations and technological advancement are not the result of random chance, but they occur as a result of humans and their desire for new innovations.

Therefore option C is correct

7 0

3 years ago

If the world's population increased exponentially from 5.937 billion in 1998 to 6.771 billion in 2008 and continued to increase

Vaselesa [24]

Answer:

The world's population would have been 7.1137 billion in 2012, and this is 0.0437 billion (i.e. 7.1137 - 7.07 = 0.0437) higher compared to the population reference bureau estimate of 7.07 billion in July 2012.

Explanation:

This can be computed using the following exponential formula:

P(t) = P(0)a^t ............................ (1)

Where;

P(t) = World population in year t.

P(0) = World population in year 0 which is 1998 = 5.937 billion

a = base = ?

t = number of years

Substituting the value into equation (1), we have:

P(t) = 5.937 * a^t .......................................... (2)

Since we have 10 years from 1998 to 2008 (i.e. 2008 - 1998 = 10), we have:

P(t) = P(10) = World population in 2008 = 6.771 billion

t = 10

Substituting the value into equation (2) and solve for a, we have:

6.771 = 5.937 * a^10

a^10 = 6.771 / 5.937

a^10 = 1.1405

a = $\sqrt[10]{1.405}$

a = 1.013

Since we have 14 years from 1998 to 2012 (i.e. 2012 - 1998 = 14), we now have:

P(t) = P(14) = World population in 2012 = ?

P(0) = World population in year 0 which is 1998 = 5.937 billion

a = 1.013 as already calculated above

t = 14

Substituting the value into equation (1), we have:

P(14) = 5.937 * 1.013^14

P(14) = 5.937 * 1.192

P(14) = 7.1137 billion

Therefore, the world's population would have been 7.1137 billion in 2012, and this is 0.0437 billion (i.e. 7.1137 - 7.07 = 0.0437) higher compared to the population reference bureau estimate of 7.07 billion in july 2012.

6 0

3 years ago