Answer:
And for this case the confidence interval is given by:
Since the confidenc einterval not contains the value 0 we can conclude that we have significant difference between the two population proportion of interest 1% of significance given. So then we can't conclude that the two proportions are equal
Step-by-step explanation:
Let p1 and p2 the population proportions of interest and let and the estimators for the proportions we know that the confidence interval for the difference of proportions is given by this formula:
And for this case the confidence interval is given by:
Since the confidence interval not contains the value 0 we can conclude that we have significant difference between the two population proportion of interest 1% of significance given. So then we can't conclude that the two proportions are equal
A suitable financial calculator can give you the answer more or less directly. Here, we find that the answer choices presented are the result of improper calculation. The multiplier was rounded to 5 decimal digits before it was used to compute the amount. As a consequence the numbers shown in your problem statement are incorrect. The only number that should be rounded is the final answer.
1. The correct amount is $14,141.98. The best of the available choices is
... $14,142.03
2. The correct amount is $10,754.65. The best of the available choices is
... $10,754.61
_____
In each case, the multiplier is (1 + r/n)^(nt), where r is the annual interest rate, n is the number of compounding periods per year, and t is the number of years. Since you want results good to 7 significant digits, your value of multiplier must be good to at least 8 significant digits.
For problem 1: (1 + .06/4)^(4·5) = 1.015^20 ≈ 1.3468550
For problem 2: (1 + .12/12)^(12*2) = 1.01^24 ≈ 1.2697346
The final account balance is the initial balance multiplied by the corresponding multiplier value.
Answer:
P(x) = 4n+5
P(4) = 4(4)+5
P(4) = 16+5
P(4) = 21
The answer is 21.
Let me know if this helps!
Answer:
m= -52
Step-by-step explanation: