Answer:
Homologies - phenotypic and genetic similarities due to shared ancestry
Analogies (homoplastic) - similarities between two species due to convergent evolution instead of descent from a common ancestor with the same trait
In general, organisms that share very similar morphologies or similar DNA sequences are likely to be more closely related than organisms with vastly different structures or sequences. In some cases, however, the morphological divergence between related species can be great and their genetic divergence small (or vice versa).
(plants very different, bc diverged 50 mil years ago)
If internal anatomy, physiology, and reproductive systems are very dissimilar, probably analogous.
The more elements that are similar in two complex structures, the more likely it is that the structures evolved from a common ancestor. If genes in two organisms share many portions of their nucleotide sequences, it is likely that the genes are homologous.:
Answer:
Oxygen is necessary for the growth of all bacteria.
Explanation:
This statement is false, because not all bacteria require oxygen to produce energy and grow. The bacteria that need oxygen to grow are called aerobic bacteria. But there are also bacteria that can produce energy without oxygen, these are called anaerobic. Some bacteria can adapt to both environments, these are called facultative anaerobes bacteria.
Answer:
The marginal cost of increasing production from 5,000 units to 6,000 would be $1,000 / 500.
Explanation:
1) False. Scientists may predict something but realize a difference soon after before the test, so they could definitely change the hypothesis if they want. It’s only AFTER the experiment they cannot. Because a hypothesis is like a “guess” as to what’s going to happen, right?
2) False. A hypothesis can’t be “valid” because it’s literally a prediction.
3) True. Especially if you’re doing a chemistry lab, it’s really important things are done in order or else the product might result as something else you were expecting, or can be very dANGEROUS
4) True. The conclusion must be based on data because it’s the observation that was seen.
Hope this helps!! I could have answered in short form but I just wanted to make them understandable:)
Breakdown of carbohydrates begins in mouth with the help of enzyme salivary amylase.
