1.Is the author's claim objective? [Topic and Position]
2.From what perspective did the author write the text? [Style]
3.Is the information arranged according to the content, by the author'sargument or by the needs of the audience? [Organization]
4.Which of the references elicits further discussion? [Research/Sources]
5.Where is the text found? [Audience]
6.Does the text mean to persuade? [Purpose/Context]
7.Are the sources credible? [Proof/Evidence]
8.Which of the evidence carries the more weight? [Proof/Evidence]
9.How is the information arranged in the text ? [Organization]
10.What can you infer from the writer's choice of words? [Style]
Answer:
This soliloquy of Hamlet is taken from Act III scene i of the play where he gave his famous "To be or not to be" speech.
Explanation:
Taken from Act III scene i of the tragedy play "Hamlet" by William Shakespeare, the plot revolves round the revenge plan of the young prince Hamlet against his uncle and step father Claudius. This speech refers to the human attitude towards death and the fear of actually dying, even though we are all destined to die one day.
Right along the lines of his famous "To be or not to be" soliloquy, the speech shows him faltering in his attempts to commit sui cide. But even though he is referring to the universal fear of saying among men, he is also indirectly referring to his own fear or reluctance to actually go forward with his proposed plan. he wants to avenge his father's murder, and get treated right as he should be. He wants to teach his uncle/ step-father/ king Claudius and his mother Queen Gertrude a lesson but he also knows it is risky and will possibly be disastrous for him too. He is rethinking his decision of doing what he had planned, admitting that "<em>the native hue of resolution Is sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought,....... their currents turn awry, And lose the name of action". </em>
Answer:
Look up essay typer! that worrrrrrks!
Explanation:
i use this alll the time
I do it is possible,if you believe something but the other side of the argument has more evidence or logically make more sense, you would still argue because it is your opinion and your belief, therefor you would want to explain it.
Answer:
<em>C) Must carry it out, but has some leeway in how strongly he or she enforces it</em>
<em></em>
<u><em>Please mark brainliest! Hope this helps!</em></u>
