(I know there isnt any real problem here to solve, but heres a tip on how to solve greatest to least with decimal problems)
1. Just because a number looks big, doesn't mean it is big
Example: 1.00000000000001 < 1.1
just look at the numbers ^ and dont just hastily read it over assuming that 1.1 is smaller because it "has less digits"
2. Negative numbers are... opposite. and they are less than positive numbers
-3.4 > -4.1
Why is this? Well, if you look on a line, with the point 0 in the middle, you can see that -3.4 is not as far away from 0 as -4.1 is. So the idea is to apply opposite logic for negative numbers
I hope these tips helped!! :D
We are choosing 2
2
r
shoes. How many ways are there to avoid a pair? The pairs represented in our sample can be chosen in (2)
(
n
2
r
)
ways. From each chosen pair, we can choose the left shoe or the right shoe. There are 22
2
2
r
ways to do this. So of the (22)
(
2
n
2
r
)
equally likely ways to choose 2
2
r
shoes, (2)22
(
n
2
r
)
2
2
r
are "favourable."
Another way: A perhaps more natural way to attack the problem is to imagine choosing the shoes one at a time. The probability that the second shoe chosen does not match the first is 2−22−1
2
n
−
2
2
n
−
1
. Given that this has happened, the probability the next shoe does not match either of the first two is 2−42−2
2
n
−
4
2
n
−
2
. Given that there is no match so far, the probability the next shoe does not match any of the first three is 2−62−3
2
n
−
6
2
n
−
3
. Continue. We get a product, which looks a little nicer if we start it with the term 22
2
n
2
n
. So an answer is
22⋅2−22−1⋅2−42−2⋅2−62−3⋯2−4+22−2+1.
2
n
2
n
⋅
2
n
−
2
2
n
−
1
⋅
2
n
−
4
2
n
−
2
⋅
2
n
−
6
2
n
−
3
⋯
2
n
−
4
r
+
2
2
n
−
2
r
+
1
.
This can be expressed more compactly in various ways.
The slope of the line is m, variable m is the slope
56.7 because it is on the hundredths place.
