Answer: No it is not.
Explanation:
Uber by first establishing itself and then fighting regulators leaves itself open to attack around the world. This is because the Regulators have the power to keep adjusting the laws that govern Uber if they feel that Uber has an unfair advantage or if it's existence is detrimental to the society. Uber has been accused many times of various infractions such as Tax Evasions and being a conduit through which crime can be committed because it did not conduct proper background checks.
Going back to the issue of taxes, if the regulators feel that Uber may be avoiding taxes, they could impose laws that either cause an increase in Uber prices or remove them from a location which can have a native influence on Uber's bottomline.
This approach is not good because regulators do not like being fought and will try to ascert dominance. It is simply not viable and this has been proven with Uber's many suspensions around the world.
I think the answer would be alone
Answer:
The correct option is 2
Explanation:
Let us assume the current value of the investment be x
And the annual growth factor of the investment is 1.2
1. The investment value has increased or risen by 44% since it was first made
It is known that the combined growth factor of the investment is 1.44 and no information is stated regarding the actual ($) values. Therefore, the unique value could not be computed.
So, this statement lacks information and insufficient to solve for x.
2. 1 year ago, the withdrawn money worth is $600 and at present the worth of the investment would be 12% less than the actual worth.
1 year ago, the value of the investment was x / 1.2. So, the equation could be set up regarding the withdrawal.
The equation would be:
= (x/ 1.2- 600) × (1.2)
=0.88x
Therefore, the unique value to could be answered and the sufficient to answer.
NOTE: The options are missing. So I am providing the answer with the options.
distribution of raw material. is decided by givernment