1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Studentka2010 [4]
3 years ago
11

A man must go to court and face a possible first degree felony charge after committing murder.

Law
2 answers:
Gemiola [76]3 years ago
6 0
Criminal law I think
aniked [119]3 years ago
3 0
Criminal law I would guess.
You might be interested in
A sales representative in a shopping centre handed Karl a flyer promoting a style cut and shave for $12 at Lion’s Mane Barber Sh
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

in both cases the flyer was presented to the barber before the service was provided.

a) no, because Karl was informed about the mistake and the real price and could then still have decided to take his business elsewhere. but if he then agreed to still have the service performed under the now updated conditions, then that is what the "contract" is basing on.

he has no grounds to claim the other price afterwards.

b) no, because the service provider saw the flyer information, did not object to or correct the information right away, but performed the service instead. now the "contract" is based on that agreement based on the conditions of the flyer.

7 0
3 years ago
If an agency fails to act in good faith with regard to a _________, the courts will hear an appeal without exhaustion.
forsale [732]

Answer: regulation

Explanation:

Citizens are allowed to sue federal administrative agencies who are empowered to make specialized rules and regulations that would enable them to properly enforce the mandate given to them by Congress.

Of course one cannot just sue at the first instance, there must have been a series of appeals to various bodies within this agency to repeal the rule or regulation that is causing grief. If those bodies refuse and it is found that the agency did not act in good faith in making the rule, the court will hear an appeal on the matter without exhaustion.

7 0
3 years ago
The ideas and philosophies that explain the origin of law and its justification are called __________. Multiple Choice stare dec
mario62 [17]

The ideas and philosophies that explain the origin of law and its justification are called  <u>jurisprudence</u><u>.</u> It is the concept that differentiates public from private law.

What holds true about jurisprudence?

Jurisprudence is not the law itself but a philosophy of the law. Several theories that assist explain the beginnings of law and its justification have evolved over the years. These legal theories (or philosophies) are referred to as jurisprudence. Jurisprudence is not the law itself but a philosophy of the law.

Positive law jurisprudence:

It thinks that law is only the state's orders enforced through force. Proper law Jurisprudence holds that the only thing that constitutes law is the state's orders accompanied by force and penalties. It runs counter to the natural law school of thought.

Learn more about jurisprudence here:

brainly.com/question/14612573

#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
all new bills are given a letter and number code following their coding they are then to committees for closer inspection
serg [7]

All new bills are given a letter and a number code, following their coding they are then passed along to committees for closer inspection.

<u>Explanation:</u>

The bill which are introduced in the legislature to be passed in order to become a law is called the new bill. Every new bill is given a letter and a number code, that alphanumeric coding is done to the bill in order to identify the new bill segregated from other new bills.

This alphanumeric coding helps the identity of the new bill according to the category of the bill in regard to the subject. When the coding is done, the new bill is passed along to the concerning committees for the closer inspection for the fate of the bill.

3 0
3 years ago
How does Article III protect the political rights of judges? Of individuals?
Scorpion4ik [409]

Answer:

in our unique judicial system, courts are protected from the influence of other branches of government, as well as shifting popular opinion. ... This allows the judiciary to make decisions based on what is right under the law, without political or personal consequences.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If you're required to wear glasses or contact lenses, it's a good idea to _____.
    8·2 answers
  • According to the preamble to the Bill of Rights, what is the purpose of the Bill of Rights? to guarantee everyone’s rights to st
    11·2 answers
  • What is an order of Supreme Court directing a lower court
    14·2 answers
  • If the family’s net monthly income is $7,800, what percent of the income is spent on food, clothing, and housing? 50% 59% 60% 61
    12·1 answer
  • What political factors affect presidents when nominating justices?<br> uthor or not to hear a case?
    9·1 answer
  • HELP ASAP PLEASEE!!!
    8·1 answer
  • This passage MOST accurately reflects the democratic ideals taken from
    5·2 answers
  • 5 Based upon the information you have learned throughout this unit on blood spatter analysis, do you feel that analyzing blood s
    12·2 answers
  • What are the 3 principles intentional peer support?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of these best explains why candidates for public office often spend so much money on
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!