1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bond [772]
3 years ago
13

Simplify 2a - 2/3b - 4 1/2a - 1/6b

Mathematics
1 answer:
ale4655 [162]3 years ago
4 0
Answer can be wrote in two ways. -2.5a-5/6b or -5a/2-5b/6
You might be interested in
Please help me. i need answers asap. please correct answers
monitta

Answer:

1.) 6

2.) -1

3.) 36

4.) 1/3

5.) 90

Step-by-step explanation:

1.) -12/a

-12/a -> -12/2

=6

2.) a+ (-b)

a+(-b) -> 2+(-3)

=-1

3.) 3a (12-2b)

3a(12-2b) -> 3(2) (12-2x3)

6(12-6)

6(6)

=36

4.) 2a-c/b

2a-c/b -> 2(2)-5/3

4-5/3

=1/3

5.) 3abc

3abc-> 3x2x3x5

=90

6 0
2 years ago
In which year will 67% of babies be born out of wedlock?
Leviafan [203]

Based on the trend of the increase in children born out of wedlock, if this trend keeps increasing, the year with 67% of babies born out of wedlock will be 2055 .

<h3>What year will 67% of babies be born to unmarried parents?</h3><h3 />

In 1990, the 28% of children were born out of wedlock and this trend was increasing by 0.6% per year.

If the trend continues, the number of years till 67% of children born out of wedlock will be:

= (67%  - 28%) / 0.6%

= 65 years

The year will be:

= 1990 + 65

= 2055

The first part of the question is:

According to the National Center for Health Statistics, in 1990, 28% of babies in the United States were born to parents who were not married. Throughout the 1990s, this percentage increased by approximately 0.6 per year.

Find out more on benefits of marriage at brainly.com/question/12132551.

#SPJ1

3 0
1 year ago
Tacoma's population in 2000 was about 200 thousand, and has been growing by about 9% each year. If this
frozen [14]

Answer (prediction, first edit):

5,600,000

Equation:

200,000+(18,000*200)=5,600,000

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Solve.<br> 4 x + 6 &lt; − 6<br><br> Thankyou In advance :&gt;
andrew-mc [135]

Answer:

x < -3

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Subtract 6 from both sides.

  • 4x + 6 - 6 < -6 - 6
  • 4x < -12

Step 2: Divide both sides by 4.

  • \frac{4x}{4} < \frac{-12}{4}
  • x < -3

Therefore, the answer is x < -3.

6 0
3 years ago
Can anyone answer this question ?​
kondaur [170]
X1=radical 6--->2.44
X2=-radical 6/3--->-0.816
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Caitlyn did 6/7 of the math quiz
    5·1 answer
  • The figure shows three quadrilaterals on a coordinate grid:
    9·2 answers
  • Question 1 of 9
    5·2 answers
  • Receive 99 points if answered correctly with steps!
    15·2 answers
  • 1<br>9. By what rational number must<br>26<br>be divided to get<br>?<br>39​
    14·1 answer
  • David has a garden with dimensions 11 feet long x 9 feet wide. He wants to enlarge the garden to an area of 126 square feet. How
    8·2 answers
  • Help me pls and thanks
    8·2 answers
  • Why is corruption discouraged in a country​
    7·1 answer
  • Baker leaves his house and drives 10 miles north then 24 miles west to Tellus Science Museum. If
    6·1 answer
  • a family of five recently replaced its 5-gallon-per-minute showerheads with water-saving 2-gallon per minute showerheads. each m
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!