The reason for imposing the price ceiling is to prevent the producer/seller from taking advantage of the consumer.
Price ceiling refers to an economic tools used by policymaker to mandate a maximum price that the seller must charge for sales of a product or service.
Price ceiling serves as a tool to prevent the producers from exploiting the consumers.
The price ceiling are imposed by the policymaker to prevent producer or seller of coffee to have price advantage of its sales to the coffee consumers.
Therefore, in conclusion, aim of preventing exploitation of consumer is the reason of imposing price ceiling on coffee market.
Read more about Price Ceiling here
<em>brainly.com/question/24644929</em>
Answer:
a. strategic ambiguity.
Explanation:
The use of strategic ambiguity permits the views for diversify or interpretations also at the same time it promotes inclusiveness and unity
The mission and vision sttaement should be confused and normal in nature in order to provide the accomodation
So the use of symbols for permitting out the multiple interpretations of messages is known as the strategic ambiguity
Therefore the option a is correct
Answer:
NPV = $1.49 million
Explanation:
<em>The NPV is the difference between the PV of cash inflows and the PV of cash outflows. A positive NPV implies a good investment decision and a negative figure implies the opposite. </em>
<em>NPV of an investment: </em>
NPV = PV of Cash inflows - PV of cash outflow
But we will need to work out the discount rate to be used for discounting the cash flows. Hence, we need to determine the cost of capital as follows:
Step 1: After-tax cost of debt
After tax cost of debt = pre-tax cost of debt × (1-tax rate rate)
= 9%× (1--0.3)=6.3%
Step 2 : Weighted Average cost of capital (WACC)
WACC=( 0.25×6.3%) + (0.75× 13%) =11.325
%
Step 3:Net Present Value (NPV)
PV of cash inflow= (1- (1.11325^-5)/0.11325)× 13.5 = 49.49 million
Initial cost = $48 million
NPV = 49.49 million - $48 million =$1.49 million
NPV = $1.49 million
Answer:
A. Yes
B. $170,000
Explanation:
A. Yes For consolidation purposes, the direction of the transfers for either upstream or downstream does affect the balances to be reported here reason been that when calculating the noncontrolling interest balances in a situation where it is present we have to taken into consideration the deferral of unrealized gross profits on upstream sales where Downstream on the other hand are assigned to the parent in which they will be viewed as if they have no any impact on the outside interest.
B. Preparation of a consolidated income statement for the year ending December 31, 2018
AKRON, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARY
Income Statement Year Ending December 31, 2018
Sales $1,380,000
[1,100,000+(600,000-320,000)
Less Cost of goods sold ($575,000)
(500,000+50,000+15,000)
Gross profit $805,000
($1,380,000-$1,380,000)
Operating expenses 635,000
(400,000+220,000+15,000)
Consolidated net income $170,000
($805,000-635,000)
Therefore Consolidated net income will be $170,000
