Answer:
1- Tung is a exemple of the ideology of personal responsability.
Explanation:
The ideology of personal responsibility corresponds to a set of personal ideologies about the facts that happen in your life.
The individual believes that everything that happens is because of his actions and therefore occurs because of his own cause and choice. Therefore, they believe that because they choose their actions, they should be held responsible for them both legally and morally.
It is important to understand that the styles describe different aspects of applications. For example, some architectural styles describe deployment patterns, some describe structure and design issues, and others describe communication factors. Therefore, a typical application will usually use a combination of more than one of the styles described in this chapter.
It is probably safe to say that most if not all decisions involve trade-offs. For example a person may be offered a job that pays well but requires 7 days per week for a month and while this is good for a younger person with no other commitments it may not work for an older person with his own family commitments and other projects. Another decision could be that for support, a husband decides to not take on major time consuming projects while his wife is doing intensive studying to become certified in a field of her choosing so that he can support her. Another example is that when one cannot drive one's son with a disability to a beach to swim because it is too far and uses too much car gas, the money saved on gas some of it could be spent on his groceries.
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
The formula to use here will be:
required rate = risk free rate + beta × (market return - risk free rate).
where,
risk free rate = 5%
beta =0.20.
market return = -30%.
Therefore,
required return = 5% + 0.20 × (-30% + -5%)
= 5% + 0.2(-35%)
= 5% - 7%
= -2%
Therefore, the return on portfolio should have been -2% but the portfolio manager produced a return of −10%
Since -10% is lower than -2%, we can deduce that the claim of the manager is wrong.
Answer and Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below
Cash $46,620
To Notes Receivable $44,400
To Interest receivable ($44,400 × 15% × 120 days ÷ 360 days)
(Being the cash received is recorded)
Here we debited the cash as it increased the assets and at the same time we credited the interest receivable and the note receivable as it decreased the assets
The same is to be considered
