The number of cases filed in the Supreme Court

Law

1 answer:

Annette [7]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

D. decrease between 1940 and 1965 but has increase since 1965.

Explanation:

The number of law suits and filed cases in Supreme Court has increase after 1965. Earlier than that the number of cases filed in Supreme Court were very few and usually the high court decides and provides the judgement regarding the case. After 1965, people started filing an appeal of review to Supreme court over the decision of High Court.

You might be interested in

Principals in the second degree are those individuals who are part of committing a crime, but aren’t the primary offender. Why a

Ivenika [448]

Principals in the second degree is a person who did not actually did any crime himself but he help the person who did the crime

<h3>What does principal of second degree mean?</h3>

A person who was present with the first degree person and assist him in the crime.

An accessory, who involves in the crime, that person will also be equally guilty as the first degree person would be.

Both will be consider as important principal in the case of the crime.

Learn more about the principal of the second degree here:-

brainly.com/question/4436337

#SPJ1

4 0

1 year ago

Always signal when you are going to: Select one : a. Change lanes, make a turn, pull away from a parking space which is parallel

miv72 [106K]

Answer:

Explanation:

A signal is need for all turns to alert traffic what you are doing.

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

George’s PTIN has been revoked as a disciplinary measure. Which of these can’t he do?

Alla [95]

Answer:

Option A (Prepare taxes for compensation) is the correct choice.

Explanation:

In the above question, options are not given. Please find the attachment of the full question.

A PTIN (preparer tax identification number) would be an inland revenue department Service identifier that was introduced in 1999 requiring all compensated federal income tax returns appraisers to registered with either the legislative branch as well as to receive a special code from 2010.
Here because the tax identifying number or code of George's Preparer has indeed been withdrawn and so he can't take responsibility for taxation for reimbursement.

The remaining three options do not apply to a particular instance. So option A seems to be the right one.