Answer:
x > 100
Step-by-step explanation:
Consider x as "Chicago Cubs".
The alligator sign always points/goes to the number (or food) with the highest value (or bigger meal).
Since Chicago Cubs wins is bigger than 100, you can write the inequality as follows:
x > 100
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that if (h,k) is the center of any circle and whose radius is = r then its equation is :
Given, the equation of circle
By comparing, we will get,
h = -2
k = 3
So, center of the circle is ( -2,3)
Answer:
The box should have base 16ft by 16ft and height 8ft Therefore,dimensions are 16 ft by 16 ft by 8 ft
Step-by-step explanation:
We were given the volume of the tank as, 2048 cubic feet.
Form minimum weight, the surface area must be minimum.
Let the height be h and the lengths be x
the volume will be: V=x²h then substitute the value of volume, we have
2048=hx²
hence
h=2048/x²
Since the amount of material used is directly proportional to the surface area, then the material needs to be minimized by minimizing the surface area.
The surface area of the box described is
A=x²+4xh
Then substitute h into the Area equation we have
A= x² + 4x(2048/x²)
A= x² + 8192/x
We want to minimize
A
dA/dx = -8192/x² + 2 x= 0 for max or min
when dA/dx=0
dA/dx= 2x-8192/x²=0
2x=8192/x²
Hence
2x³=8192
x³=4096
x=₃√(4096)
X=16ft
Then h=2048/x²
h=2048/16²
h=8ft
The box should have base 16ft by 16ft and height 8ft
Hence the dimensions are 16 ft by 16 ft by 8 ft
Answer:
3.5
Step-by-step explanation:
These are similar triangles.
BC:AC = BD:AD
6:5 is the ratio.
Then, simply multiply:
4.2 x 5/6 = 3.5
So, x = 3.5!
You cannot rely on the drawing alone to prove or disprove congruences. Instead, pull out the info about the sides and angles being congruent so we can make our decision.
The diagram shows that:
- Side AB = Side XY (sides with one tick mark)
- Side BC = Side YZ (sides with double tickmarks)
- Angle C = Angle Z (similar angle markers)
We have two pairs of congruent sides, and we also have a pair of congruent angles. We can't use SAS because the angles are not between the congruent sides. Instead we have SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem (recall that ambiguity is possible for SSA). The triangles may be congruent, or they may not be, we would need more information.
---------------
So to answer the question if they are congruent, I would say "not enough info". If you must go with a yes/no answer, then I would say "no, they are not congruent" simply because we cannot say they are congruent. Again we would need more information.
