All categories

2 years ago

(Quadratic Regressions)

Mathematics

1 answer:

Anon25 [30]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

y = - 15.57x² + 179.32x + 0.20

510

Step-by-step explanation:

The quadratic model obtained using a quadratic regression solver with Coefficient rounded to the nearest hundredth is :

y = - 15.57x² + 179.32x + 0.20

Where, height = y

x = time

Using the model obtained ; the height, to the nearest foot, at a time, x = 6.4 seconds.

y = - 15.57x² + 179.32x + 0.20

y = - 15.57(6.4^2) + 179.32(6.4) + 0.20

y = 510.1008

y = 510

You might be interested in

HELPPPPP: The average high temperatures each month in Dallas, Texas are shown in the chart. What value represents the 3rd 3rd qu

Sloan [31]

Answer: 79

Step-by-step explanation:

Line up the numbers from least to greatest. 39, 42, 44, 51, 55, 62, 66, 72, 77, 81, 94, 86 Then find the Median. Look at the upper part of the data set and from there find the 3rd quartile.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the value of y?

RUDIKE [14]

Answer:

C. 55

Step-by-step explanation:

Since all angles in a triangle add up to 180°, we have:

40 + y + y + 30 = 180

2y + 70 = 180

2y = 110

y = 55

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Check whether the relation R on the set S = {1, 2, 3} is an equivalent

kozerog [31]

Answer:

$R$ isn't an equivalence relation. It is reflexive but neither symmetric nor transitive.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let $S$ denote a set of elements. $S \times S$ would denote the set of all ordered pairs of elements of $S\!$ .

For example, with $S = \lbrace 1,\, 2,\, 3 \rbrace$ , $(3,\, 2)$ and $(2,\, 3)$ are both members of $S \times S$ . However, $(3,\, 2) \ne (2,\, 3)$ because the pairs are ordered.

A relation $R$ on $S\!$ is a subset of $S \times S$ . For any two elements $a,\, b \in S$ , $a \sim b$ if and only if the ordered pair $(a,\, b)$ is in $R\!$ .

A relation $R$ on set $S$ is an equivalence relation if it satisfies the following:

Reflexivity: for any $a \in S$ , the relation $R$ needs to ensure that $a \sim a$ (that is: $(a,\, a) \in R$ .)

Symmetry: for any $a,\, b \in S$ , $a \sim b$ if and only if $b \sim a$ . In other words, either both $(a,\, b)$ and $(b,\, a)$ are in $R$ , or neither is in $R\!$ .

Transitivity: for any $a,\, b,\, c \in S$ , if $a \sim b$ and $b \sim c$ , then $a \sim c$ . In other words, if $(a,\, b)$ and $(b,\, c)$ are both in $R$ , then $(a,\, c)$ also needs to be in $R\!$ .

The relation $R$ (on $S = \lbrace 1,\, 2,\, 3 \rbrace$ ) in this question is indeed reflexive. $(1,\, 1)$ , $(2,\, 2)$ , and $(3,\, 3)$ (one pair for each element of $S$ ) are all elements of $R\!$ .

$R$ isn't symmetric. $(2,\, 3) \in R$ but $(3,\, 2) \not \in R$ (the pairs in $\! R$ are all ordered.) In other words, $3$ isn't equivalent to $2$ under $R\!$ even though $2 \sim 3$ .

Neither is $R$ transitive. $(3,\, 1) \in R$ and $(1,\, 2) \in R$ . However, $(3,\, 2) \not \in R$ . In other words, under relation $R\!$ , $3 \sim 1$ and $1 \sim 2$ does not imply $3 \sim 2$ .