It would be because of Non selling activities
Answer:
Risk and Return
1. Joe is an average investor. His financial advisor gave him options of investing in stock A, with a σ of 12%, and stock B, with a σ of 9%. Both stocks have the same expected return of 16%. Joe can pick only one stock and decides to invest in stock B.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
2. Marcie works for an educational technology firm that recently launched its employee stock option plan (ESOP). Marcie allocated all her investments in the ESOP.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
3. rin wants to invest in a hedge fund that has had a very strong performance track record. The hedge fund has given its investors a return of over 60% for the past five years. Although Erin is tempted to put her money in the fund, she decides to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund’s assets, because she is aware that past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
Explanation:
1. Joe's decision to invest in stock B is a good financial decision. Since both investments have the same returns, the decision on which investment to take shifts to the standard deviation of the returns, which specifies the variability of the returns. Invariably, the investment with less standard deviation should win the vote. Therefore, Joe's decision is a good financial decision because investment in B has a standard deviation of 9% unlike A's 12%.
2. Putting all eggs in one market as Marcie had done by allocating all her investments in the ESOP is not a good financial decision, theoretically. It is always best to spread the risks, though higher-yielding investments (returns) bear higher risks.
3. The decision of Erin to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund's assets, despite its past performance is a good financial decision. Due diligence reveals some behind-the-scene information that are instrumental in making sound business decisions. Who are the present managers of the fund? What systems are in place in the entity to guarantee similar future performance, all things being equal? What market's sentiments and information are available for consideration? These questions, and many others can be answered through a due diligence. Surely, "past performance is no guarantee of future results."
Answer: 10% or $2,000,000
Explanation:
Seeing as no figures were produced, we will have to do this ourselves.
We will make assumptions which include the following,
Life of the equipment = 10 Years
Salvage value = 0
Those are our 2 assumptions.
In that case then,
The Annual Depreciation will be,
Depreciation = (Cost of equipment - Estimated salvage value) / Estimated useful life
= (20 - 0) / 10
= $2 million
Seeing as 2 million is,
= 2/20 * 100
= 10%
That would mean that annual depreciation costs at that facility will rise by $2 million or 10%.
If you need any clarification do react or comment.
<span>The largest cattle rancher in a given region will be unable to have a __________ when sufficient numbers of smaller cattle ranchers provide sources of competition.
Monoply
</span>
Answer:
Douglas can afford 21697.88 to borrow to purchase a car.
Explanation:
As the formula for calculating present value is given as:
PV = PMT * ( (1-(1+r)^-n) / r )
As Douglas can afford 240$ a month for five years for a car loan so
it means that payment = 240
$
As the APR is 8.5% which means after dividing by 12 the rate per month = 8.5%/12
Total number of Months = 5*12
Total number of Months = 60
Putting these values into the above formula, we get
PV = PMT * ( (1-(1+r)^-n) / r )
PV = 240 * ( (1-(1+8.5%/12)^-60) / (8.5%/12) )
PV = 11697.88
As the down payment = 10,000 so the total value of car
= 11697.88+10000
= 21697.88
Douglas can afford 21697.88 to borrow to purchase a car.
