The answer is B.
Schenk vs US involves a freedom of speech case in which Schenk encouraged American citizens to avoid the military draft during World War I.
The Supreme Court ruled this was not protected free speech because it provides a clear and present danger to American citizens. The court felt that influencing people to not join the war presented a danger to America’s war effort.
Answer:
In simple words, Whenever a juvenile is accused of breaking a penal code, the process used in a normal criminal prosecution is somewhat dissimilar from that employed by adult felons.
A minor can come into communication with laws officers as a result of a suspected breach of a specific law in a range of methods. Police apprehend some juveniles, and others are reported to authorities by their family or school administrators .
A law enforcement officer can choose to interact with a juvenile in a variety of ways, depending on how the police learn of a possible juvenile case. In general, they are issued a warning or sometimes referred to Juvenile court.
Answer:
Lucretia Mott and Elizabeth Cady Stanton were the leaders.
Explanation:
If you have any questions feel free to ask in the comments - Mark
Also when you have the chance please mark me brainliest.
The answer to the question is B
