Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory evidence
Answer: boomerang children
Explanation:
The boomerang children or the boomerang generation applies to young people who after living alone choose to return to live with their parents. This phenomenon is typical of western culture where young people, upon graduating from high school, move to live alone and generally do not return to live with their parents until they create their own families.
Among the various situations that generate this phenomenon is the economic situation that prevents young people from being economically independent, as well as the emotional dependence on parents and also the immaturity and lack of desire to assume the responsibilities of adulthood.
Also, due to the high economic standards of many universities, many young people get to live with their parents to pay the costs of the study.
I hope this information can help you.
Answer: D) Fewer; More
Explanation:
Compared with Gardner, Sternberg has identified fewer independent dimensions of intelligence and his forms of intelligence have been more reliably measured. Sternberg presented his theory of intelligence where he suggested various forms of intelligence present in the human beings which includes analytical, practical and distinct type of intelligence. He further came up with the logic of being creative and innovative. Besides proposing this theory, he also proposed theory of love as well by presenting some factors to measure ans show love. Whereas, Gardner also proposed intelligence theory where he came up with multiple forms of human intelligence. If we compare both of them, we will come to know Strindberg has certainly found less independent dimension of human intelligence as compared to Gardner but the factors proposed by Sternberg were ore accurate and truly valid when it comes to the practical intelligence which further was proved and supported by later studies and researches.
add me on snap alexetienne1234
<span>Answer: Out of country natural disasters are much harder to get donations for than local disasters. Americans are more willing to help Americans.
The BGC may not be able to prove where the donations go- many other foundations have been exposed by the media as not using any of the donations for their intended cause- Americans are on the alert and may be extremely cautious about giving donations.
If the BGC is not in good repor with the media and the general public, then getting any type of donations will be difficult.
The BGC may not have enough time and money to commit to multiple natural disaster aide projects. If stretched too thin, not enough money will go to the right places and people.</span>
