Question:
The Dodd-Frank wall street reform and protection act stipulated that if more than $1 million is collected, the whistle-blower is entitled to _____ of the monies collected.
A) between 10 and 30 percent
B) a minimum of 50 percent
C) a minimum of 75 percent
D) between 50 and 75 percent
Answer:
The correct answer is A) Between 10 and 30 percent of the monies collected.
Explanation:
The Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (also known as Dodd–Frank) is a US Federal Law that was instituted on July 21, 2010.
It was created to revamp the financial regulation in the aftermath of the Great Recession, and brought about reforms to all federal financial regulatory agencies and almost every part of the nation's financial services industry.
Under the act, whistle blowers were promised 10-30 percent of all monies collected.
Cheers!
<span>The plantwide overhead rate method means </span>using overhead rate to allocate costs to products and includes <span>indirect costs (overhead cost) to cost allocation base (single plantwide overhead rate) to cost objects (products 1-3).
</span><span>The statement that the unit of product is the cost object when the plantwide overhead rate method is used is true. </span>
First you would add all the numbers together.
32.45-- Is your answer
Next you round the answer to the nearest cent or hundreth beacuse there the same
32.45
-
In this the 5 is the nearest cent. The saying is 5 or more raise a score, 5 or less let it rest, so you new number would be
32.50 Is your final answer
Answer:
1. Reputation.
Apple and IBM are big companies which is why their reputation was able to survive the bribery charges. You are most likely not as big as either of these companies so if you are charged with bribery, your reputation might not be able to recover like theirs did.
It is always best to be associated with a good reputation. A good reputation gives you customers who will be loyal because they appreciate the integrity you have. You should not throw this away by bribing people.
2. Consequences.
It is because Apple and IBM are so big that they were able to settle the bribery charge with the Courts. Smaller companies or people that have lesser effects on the financial system might find that their punishments will be more severe to act as a deterrent.
U.S. macroeconomic policy package of 1965-1968
