We know that
l² = r² + h²
l² = (10.5)² + (36)²
l² = 110.25 + 1296
l² = 1406.5
l = √(1406.5)
l = 37.5 cm
Now,
CSA of cone = πrl
=> 22/7 × 10.5 × 37.5
=> 22 × 1.5 × 37.5
=> 1237.5 cm²
Area of 20 caps = 20 × 1237.5
=> 24750 cm²
Answer:
Since the p value is lower than the significance level we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is different from 50.5 mpg
Step-by-step explanation:
Data given and notation
represent the sample mean
represent the population standard deviation for the sample
sample size
represent the value that we want to test
represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.
z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)
represent the p value for the test (variable of interest)
Sytem of hypotheses.
We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the true mean is different from 50.5, the system of hypothesis would be:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic is given by:
(1)
Replacing we got:
P-value
Since is a two tailed test the p value would be:
Conclusion
Since the p value is lower than the significance level we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean is different from 50.5 mpg
Answer:
19/42 or .4523809524 pasta eaten
Step-by-step explanation:
2/7+1/6=19/42 or .4523809524
Answer:
Let one integer be x, and the other be (x+2)
x(x+2)=224
x2+2x-224=0
(x+16)(x-14) =0
x=-16 or 14
so x+2 = -14 or 16
So the integers are either 14 and 16 or -14 and -16.
Step-by-step explanation:
was that the question?
Answer:
224
Step-by-step explanation:
im pretty sure its right