Answer:
D) Growth in earnings per share averaging 15% or better annually for the next five years
Explanation:
First of all, objectives must be well defined and measurable. That is why increasing profitability is a good idea but not a very good strategic objective, since a 0.00001% growth in profits will still comply with it. The same applies with growing market share.
Improving product quality will help improve total sales but it is not a financial objective.
The only financial objective that is precise and measurable is option D, which sets the goal of increasing earnings per share at least 15% every year.
Answer:
The answer is c. present value index
Explanation:
Present value index is the ratio decided by dividing net present value of the project by its require initial net cash outflows.
Once having constraint on selecting investment with positive NPV to be made due to lack of fund, a firm's usually use Present value index for further decision making.
The investment with higher present value index shows that it generates more net cash flow or in other words, more efficient and requires less initial cash outflow, and thus usually be chosen over the other ones with lower present value index.
Answer:
If Jenny doesn’t earn any interest on her savings and wants to perfectly smooth consumption across her life, how much will she consume every year?
Jenny's total income during her life = income as tax analyst ($60,000 x 10) + income as PhD student ($12,000 x 5) + income as Art Director (35 x $95,000) = $3,985,000
she generated income during 50 years and expects to live 20 more, so in order to perfectly smooth consumption across her life, she must divide her total life income by 70 years = $3,985,000 / 70 years = $56,928.57 per year
What might prevent her from perfectly smoothing consumption?
First of all, besides inflation, you also earn interest on your savings. That is why 401k and other retirement accounts work so well (the magic of compound interest). Even if inflation and interests didn't exist, you cannot know exactly what you are going to earn in the future and for how many years. In this case, she earned $60,000 for 10 years, but then earned only $12,000 during 5 years. If she really wanted to smooth her consumption, she would have needed to get a loan because her savings during the first 10 years wouldn't be enough.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
It's True because you have to deduct from the total Accounts Receivable the balance in the Cr Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts estimated.
The company estimate that 2% of the total Credit Sales will be uncollectible, which is, $4,000, if we deduct this value of the balance of accounts receivable of $38,000, we have a Net Realizable Value of Accounts Receivable of $34,000
Credit Sales $ 200,000
Cr Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts $ 4,000
Dr Accounts receivable $ 38,000
Net Realizable Value of Accounts receivable $ 34,000
Because of the wealth effect, a rising aggregate price level "reduces" the purchasing power of wealth and therefore "reduces" the aggregate quantity of output demanded.
<h3>What is wealth effect?</h3>
According to the wealth effect, a behavioural economic hypothesis, customers will spend more money even if their income stays the same.
The effect of wealth effect on aggregate demand is-
- People will increase their consumption as their wealth rises. Thus, at lower price levels compared to higher price levels, the consumption component of aggregate demand will be stronger.
- A person's desire for inexpensive fast food is likely to decline as their income rises, but their desire for more costly steak may increase.
To know more about the aggregate demand and aggregate supply, here
brainly.com/question/25749867
#SPJ4
