1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fittoniya [83]
3 years ago
5

Gibbons v. Ogden was mainly about the power of Congress to regulate commerce. issue licenses. defend civil rights. regulate stat

es' rights. It allowed the federal government to issue licenses for commerce between states.
History
2 answers:
NeX [460]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Yes that person was right !

Explanation:

Free_Kalibri [48]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

commerce.

Explanation:

Gibbons v. Ogden was a civil case that was decided in 1824. In it, the United States' Supreme Court gave a ruling by ascertaining the tenet that states do not have the jurisdiction granted by legislative enactment to halts or obstructs the United States Congress power to regulate commerce.

Hence, the main point of Gibbons v. Ogden was mainly about the power of Congress to regulate COMMERCE.

You might be interested in
Which governing principle is best reflected by the restrictions placed on Congress by the Constitution? (Apex)
Flauer [41]
I would say D but im not sure
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP PLEASE
Norma-Jean [14]

National Defense

Religious Right

C. Wright Mills

Majority Rule

Society

Confederate Monarchy

Karl Marx, Social Equality

Aristocracy

Social Justice

Monarch Council

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who has the responsibility to bring a case against a citizen who they suspect has committed a crime against the state?
poizon [28]

The State Prosecutor is responsible for bringing charges against someone suspected of committing a crime in their state's jurisdiction. The third choice is correct.

5 0
3 years ago
Even though Democrats made gains in the 1948 election, they still:
alex41 [277]

Answer:

faced their divisions in their party.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
13.
Katyanochek1 [597]
A: He wanted to quickly end the war in the Pacific without invading.

Germany had surrender by this point in the war, and it was only Japan left, they didn't want to cause more casualties by a full-scale invasion, so they wanted to use the bombs in hopes to end the war for good.
7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What right did the English nobles gain from King John signing the Magna Carta? Parliament would be required to meet once a year.
    7·2 answers
  • What was Jefferson referring to as the, Fire bell in the Night? (1821)
    7·1 answer
  • Which phrase best describes the British government during the 19th century?
    13·1 answer
  • How did Christianity spread to the Slavic lands
    14·1 answer
  • How did the United States take advantage of its military victories over in Mexico
    5·1 answer
  • What was that problem faced by the Filipino pupils in the primary education during Rizal's time and before his time? one sentenc
    6·1 answer
  • The enlightenment was spurred on by all of the following except
    9·1 answer
  • What is a mutual fund?
    12·1 answer
  • Why was Allende opposed in chile
    13·1 answer
  • Pls, help giving brainliest! (20 points) i rlly need help
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!