Answer:
The question lacks options, the options are:
A) 1 out of 16
B) 3 out of 16
C) 6 out of 16
D) 9 out of 16
The answer is 1 out of 16
Explanation:
This is a DIHYBRID cross because it involves two different genes coding for distinct traits. One of the traits will be dominant while the other recessive. Hence, parents that are purebred for opposite forms of the trait means that one parent is homozygous dominant while the other is homozygous recessive. When these two parents cross, they produce F1 offsprings that all possess the dominant trait but heterozygous/hybrids.
When these hybrids are self-crossed, they produce four different combinations of gametes which when crossed using a punnet square will result in F2 offsprings with a 9:3:3:1 phenotypic ratio according to Mendel's observation.
9 represents offsprings that are dominant for both traits
The two 3's represents offsprings that are recessive for one trait and dominant for the other respectively.
1 represents offsprings that are homozygous recessive for both traits.
Hence, 1 out of 16 offsprings will be homozygous recessive for both traits.
Answer:
Explanation:
https ://us05web.zoom.u s/j/850 39847778?pwd=T0F pQ3pIelJ oQ1RidWhvVF ppQ1lvQT09
copy and paste
Answer:
Trees and birds have a commensalism relationship. The birds benefit from having a place to build their nests, while the trees are unharmed and not impacted by the bird’s presence.
Explanation:
Answer:
b. overflow incontinence
Explanation:
Overflow incontinence is a medical condition that is characterized by uncontrolled leakage of urine from filled urinary bladder in the absence of the urge to urinate by the affected individual.
It is a condition that is usually caused by blockage of bladder outlet or weakness in the muscle responsible for the expulsion of urine from the bladder.
The correct option is b.
Answer:
To conclude, you cannot prove a hypothesis because you can never generalise the results to the whole population and foresee the results will always be the same in the future. You can however, reject the null hypothesis consistently, through statistical hypothesis testing so that the theory becomes highly likely to be true, but not proven.
Explanation:
