Answer:
Extravagant hypothesis.
Explanation:
Fallacies represent the error/flaw in reasoning that spoils the validity of the argument. An extravagant hypothesis is a kind of fallacy that occurs when an exaggerated or unlikely explanation or comparison is provided unnecessarily where a simpler or less elaborate description could work more efficiently. <em>Similarly, this example proposes an extravagant comparison(with 'aliens') that represents a flaw in logical reasoning(comparison here) </em>that neglects the effectiveness of the intended meaning. Thus, it exemplifies the 'extravagant hypothesis' fallacy.
I would think the answer is “C”, I don’t see a problem-solution or a cause & effect in the passage, and there is no chronological order of anything. So my answer would be “Fact by Fact”
The answers are as follows:
21. The conjunction is 'BUT'. It is a COORDINATING conjunction.
22. The conjunction is 'WERE'. It is a COORDINATING conjunction.
23. The conjunction is ' PROVIDED THAT. It is a SUBORDINATING conjunction.
24. The conjunction is EITHER, OR. It is a correlative conjunction.
25. The conjunction in the sentence is 'UNLESS'. It is a SUBORDINATING CONJUNCTION.
26. The conjunction is 'AND'. It is a COORDINATING CONJUNCTION.
27. The conjunction in the sentence is 'SINCE. It is a SUBORDINATING conjunction.
28. The conjunction is 'ALTHOUGH'. It is a SUBORDINATING conjunction.
Conjunctions are words that are used in sentences to link two words, phrases or clauses together. Conjunctions are divided into three major classes, which are coordinating, subordinating and correlative. The coordinating conjunctions are used to joint two words, clauses or phrases together. The subordinating conjunctions are used to connect two groups of words by making one of the group to be subordinate to the other one. The correlative conjunctions are used in pairs to join elements that are equal in value.
Answer:
I think C because I learned this before
Hope this helps
Come again? I'm not understanding the question.
