The number of canidates cooperatios taking over the election process it is still is important to vote
Answer:
Dissatisfaction or Disinterest With One's Job. ...
Inability to Listen to Others. ...
Lack of Transparency & Trust. ...
Communication Styles (when they differ) ...
Conflicts in the Workplace. ...
Cultural Differences & Language.
Explanation:
Primary Source. The evidence that gives this away is that it is a fragment of a stone dated back to 232 B.C.
The author of this artifact was Asoka. The Mauryan Leader.
The purpose of creating this artifact was to assert Asoka's Buddhism and support his desire to spread dharma.
Evidence that makes me think this is that the tenets have Buddhism engraved them meaning that they had some sort of meaning to the leader.
Something that we have today that is similar to Asoka's rock pillars are edicts?
I hope this helps you out. I wasn't too sure about the last question though.
The term “sense of ownership” is frequently cited as a significant characteristic of community development. While there is increasing use of the terms ownership or sense of ownership, there is a paucity of research regarding what these terms mean, how this body of knowledge influences community development, and the various approaches that can be applied in contemporary community research and practice. A sense of ownership in community development is described as a concept through which to assess whose voice is heard, who has influence over decisions, and who is affected by the process and outcome. Applying the concept of ownership can determine how the strategic interests and actions of individuals or organizations contribute to community development efforts. In addition, the potential for ownership can be understood in part by examining the capacity for and quality of trust. Implications are discussed regarding how the concept of ownership advances the current field, specifically regarding community development research and practice.
Thank you for posting your question here. It can be considered to be consistent with the given facts. As you know, an hypothesis, much less a theory, is never proven. It can be shown to be consistent with given observations. As new observations are collected, the given hypothesis may have to be modified.
If the celery became crisp when it was soaked in ice water, then clearly that the water has rehydrated the celery is a reasonable hypothesis. But did it have to be ice cold water? Would room temperature water work? What about boiling water?
And thus most of the time, the success of an hypothesis leads to the design of new experiments to test and expand the original hypothesis.
