Answer:
Authoritarian parents
Explanation:
Authoritarian parents are the parenting style is the style in which the parents are highly demanding low at the response. These parents have high expectations from their children and in return pay very little response and nurturance to the children. When children do the mistakes they have been very harshly beaten or punished by the parent's Feedback is usually negative for the children. These types of parents are very strict and disciplines and harsh. Yelling and corporal punishment are seen as common in such type of parents.
Answer:
Reactive aggression
Explanation:
Reactive aggression refers to an aggression that occurs when someone or something else provokes the reaction, for example, a perceived threat and in the statement, it indicates that Bill punches the man because he insulted him and his agression was a reaction to the provocation. According to this, the answer is that this scenario depicts an example of reactive aggression.
Answer:Sutherland's differential association theory.
Explanation: This is a micro and a learning theory. It states that individuals learn values, skills, attitudes, techniques that motivate them to commit criminal acts through association and interaction with others.
<span>According to erikson, if the psychological conflict of adolescence is resolved negatively, young person experiences initiative versus guilt
people in adolescence age tend to be really curious and started to questions everything that threw out at them (including ethics and norms) which often caused conflict within their mind.
When these conflicts resolved negatively, those who succumb will overwhelmed by guilt and those who don't will rebel</span>
Answer:
The correct answer would be, It lessens the chance that bias will affect the review process.
Explanation:
Grant proposal reviewers are people who review the proposal came to them to approve or reject a grant. They select the proposal on the basis of certain ground to approve the grant. If there comes a proposal, which conflicts with their interest, then it is better to get themselves removed from the review process, because if they do so, there are pretty fair chances that they become biased and can reject the grant on the basis of their own views. So if they get themselves separated from the review process, it would lessen the chance that bias will affect the review process.
