Consider this figure. Enter the measure of
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the given question.
We can write the null hypothesis & the alternative hypothesis as:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
From above, let's think about the type I error we could make and the type II error we could make.
<u>Type I error:</u>
The type I error at the null hypothesis showcases that the snow level is at 6 inches or below 6 inches, but we falsely concluded that the snow level is high above sea level.
<u>Type II error:</u>
Here, the snow level is literally above 6 inches, hence, we failed to conclude that the snow level is above 6 inches.
Thus, the consequences of the above analysis showcase that type II error has higher severe consequences because it may result in a situation that may endanger the passengers' safety.
Answer:
D. 5 inches
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
A frozen dinner is divided into 3 sections on a circular plate with a 12-inch diameter.
That means complete angle having 360° is divided into 3 section.
The central angle formed by the peach cobbler is 105 degrees.
The central angle formed by the pasta is 203 degrees.
<u>Question asked:</u>
What is the approximate length of the arc of the section containing the peas?
<u>Solution:</u>
The central angle formed by the peas = 360° - 105° - 203°
= 52°
As we know:
Therefore, the approximate length of the arc of the section containing the peas are 5 inches.