The first blank would be strengthening and the second blank is weakening. Negative reinforcement can increase the child's behavior because your negative reinforcement conditions him that it is ok to do such thing. While positive punishment is disregarded when the person practices negative reinforcement,
Shamus Khan is a renowned sociologist with research interests on inequality and elites. He comes from an economically privileged immigrant family and attended St. Paul's school in Concord, New hampshire, where he graduated in 1996. Since he had a comfortable background and studied at that same institution, he was already familiar with the setting he would encounter during his reasearch in St. Paul's, which is stated in his book "Privilege
: The Making of an Adolescent Elite at St. Paul's School".
Answer:
The federal courts were empowered to intervene.
Explanation:
As a result of the 14th Amendment, the federal courts gained the power to intervene in the area to impose equal protection of the laws. The courts were also allowed to import certain rights which promoted freedom of speech, freedom of religion, protection from unreasonable and unfair treatment and punishment. It promoted equal protection for the well-being of citizens and encouraged harmony to make the area peaceful.
Answer:
Descriptive
Explanation:
Marketing research is the assets of the association. It is a very precious data. Before appreciating it first of all you should know where we can use it properly. You should review the role of the data. You should know where you should use this data. It properly affects the member's engagement and association growth. So that typically the market research is about planning, collection, and analysis of the data.
Thus here Cleo is given the responsibility of gathering information about the countries. where the sale of the cameras is very high. and the reason behind it. The Cleo will match the performance of the descriptive role of marketing research.
Although some cases are decided based on written briefs alone, many cases are selected for an "oral argument" before the court. Oral argument in the court of appeals is a structured discussion between the appellate lawyers and the panel of judges focusing on the legal principles in dispute. Each side is given a short time — usually about 15 minutes — to present arguments to the court.