The company that purchased the mine better approach the situation by developing a strategy that include all stakeholders.
In the year 2006, giant of the mining industry Xstrata purchased the Tintaya copper mine in Espinar, Peru. There has been a dispute between the community and the mine over issues including land rights, pollution, and social responsibility of the mining company. The previous mine owner had established a good dialogue table with the local community. According to many people , when Xstrata took over, the company did not abide by those arrangements which were made by the previous owner.
That is why if Xstrata wants to make better then it should consider the interest of every stakeholder over there.
To know more about Tintaya copper mine here:
brainly.com/question/11045973
#SPJ4
Answer:
Reject,
Explanation:
When calculating the IRR, I got 16.6%, which is less than the wacc. This means that the rate of return is lower than what it costs 18% wacc.
I think the answer should be reject, less.
Answer:
C, none of the choices
Explanation:
from the qeustion, it can be seen that Uri was offered a test ride of the car but he clearly refused. For him to have bought that car without a test drive and later realise the car has a faulty suspenion, he cannot rescind the contract on any of the bases because if he had agreed to the test drive, he would have found out about the faukty suspension and woudn't have bought that car.
It is clearly Uri's fault that he ended up with a car that has a faulty susppension. this isn't a case of fraud or mistake on the part of Stan, neither did Stan unduely influence him to buy the car according to the question.
Cheers.
