Mapp v. Ohio Case: Do you agree with the Court’s decision in the Mapp case? Give reasons for your answer.

Law

1 answer:

Aleksandr-060686 [28]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment. Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."

You might be interested in

write three sentence where you difine gender based violence write three sentences why you defined gender-based violence

Novay_Z [31]

Answer: gender based voilence in the sence that either a woman can be a victim of voilence or a man as well

We shouldn't only see it that only women can be victims of voilence, in the sense that there are men with women's bone in them that the can't help but fall victim of those women who could be mistaken as men in the way they treat the opposite gender

Gender based violence isn't when the opposite gender raises his or her hands on you but on small cases like a woman who cherishes to be a landlord where as the husband has nothing to his name, this woman is voilating her husband's right which may cause the man to become violent to his wife

Explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

C) Write the correct option:

Nana76 [90]

Answer:

I could not see your other last question

3 0

2 years ago

Chủ nghĩa Mác-Lênin khẳng định: "Một cuộc cách mạng chỉ có giá trị khi nào nó biết tự bảo vệ và bảo vệ tổ quốc XHCN là một tất y

3241004551 [841]

Hm i’m not sure, is this russian?

6 0

2 years ago

The procedure in which the prosecutor and defense adorney question potential jurors to pick a jury is known as which of the foll

lorasvet [3.4K]

The answer is Voir dire.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following contributed most directly to the enactment of the law in the excerpt?

Sedaia [141]

The statement that contributed most directly to the enactment of the law in the excerpt provided is that the "European demands for laborers in the New World."

This is evident in the fact that Queen Isabella said, "I command you to compel and oblige the said Indians to deal and associate with the Christians of the said island, to work in their buildings in collecting and mining gold and other metals, and to grow food and supplies for the Christian settlers and inhabitants of the said island."

The excerpt was culled from the letter of Queen Isabella to Nicolas de Ovando, governor of Hispaniola, in the year 1503.

During this period, the governor of Hispaniola in the New World sees the need for laborers in New Spain.

Queen Isabella made the Decree on Indian Labor, which approved the forced labor of Native Indians by the Spanish.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that at some point in New World, the Spanish saw the need for laborers to helped them settle in the continent.

Learn more here: brainly.com/question/8364655

3 0

1 year ago