1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ksju [112]
3 years ago
9

Mapp v. Ohio Case: Do you agree with the Court’s decision in the Mapp case? Give reasons for your answer.

Law
1 answer:
Aleksandr-060686 [28]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment.  Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."

You might be interested in
A(n) ___ is the presemtation of a grievance by the plaintiff in a civil case.
hodyreva [135]
I believe the answer is complaint if I remember correctly. Hope it helps!
8 0
3 years ago
explain why you believe the federal government’s management of mail-in voting either upholds or challenges
galben [10]

Answer:

This may not answer your question, but I've got a theory that may help.

Despite fears, research shows neither party gains an advantage. Those who attempt to abuse mail-in ballots can potentially be charged with election fraud. If candidates think there has been voter fraud, they can draw strong evidence in order to prove it.

6 0
3 years ago
Where is the closest court where you could file a small claim?
neonofarm [45]

First, to the nearest government office. To file a small claim in my state of California, you must

  1. Figure Out How to Name the Defendant.
  2. Ask for Payment.
  3. Find the Right Court to File Your Claim.
  4. Fill Out Your Court Forms.
  5. File Your Claim.
  6. Serve Your Claim.
  7. Go to Court.
6 0
3 years ago
I need to know answer please brainliest
Eddi Din [679]
I’m not 100% sure but I believe this is how it should go, hope this helps. Distributive Policy: Benefits a large of group, aims to improve the public good, aims to solve major societal problems. Redistributive Policy: benefit a small group of people & uses tax revenue
8 0
3 years ago
A person driving to work is issued a ticket for running a red light.
Elan Coil [88]

I guess you would just have to pay the ticket

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 11. At a minimum, your vehicle insurance policy must provide coverage of _________ for injury or death of one person.
    15·2 answers
  • One positive outcome of gangs in prison is .
    7·2 answers
  • 3. Good searching sets up good..
    11·1 answer
  • Eleanor is a prosecuting attorney. She has prepared a strong case against the defendant, Arthur, who has been accused of arson.
    9·1 answer
  • If you enter an intersection or railroad and get stuck because of all the cars in front of you, you have violated California's _
    5·1 answer
  • 2. An intersection where drivers must follow right-of-way rules rather than a stop sign or traffic signal is known as __________
    13·2 answers
  • The Constitution limits the executive branch from declaring war by giving that power to
    13·1 answer
  • Strict liability is where fault has to be proven in a case.<br> True or false?
    5·1 answer
  • tatiana tarasoff was killed by prosenjit poddar, a graduate student at the university of california. tatiant's parents sued; the
    12·1 answer
  • Without any relevant defense or reason, T punches V from behind. This is a(n) . . .
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!