1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ksju [112]
2 years ago
9

Mapp v. Ohio Case: Do you agree with the Court’s decision in the Mapp case? Give reasons for your answer.

Law
1 answer:
Aleksandr-060686 [28]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment.  Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."

You might be interested in
Regarding Due Process, Utah Senator Stan Lee quoted __________ who said "arbitrary imprisonment is one of the favorite and most
Alenkinab [10]

Answer:

lebron jamesssss           skskskskskskksksksskskksksksksksskkskksks

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
In georgia, who is most responsible for enforcing the laws of the state?.
Rudiy27

Answer:the governor is MOST responsible for enforcing the laws of the state                                                                               

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Affirmative action is a government response to what aspect of a business?.
gayaneshka [121]

Answer:

affirmative action began as a government remedy to the effects of long-standing discrimination against such groups and has consisted of policies, programs, and procedures that give time limited preferences to minorities and women in job hiring, admission to the institutions of higher education, the awarding of government

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
What effect if any does the development of new areas of Science and Technology have on theories ​
bulgar [2K]

Answer:

Theories may be proven to be true and become hypotheses. After an investigation, Kuri determines that her hypothesis was wrong.

6 0
3 years ago
How does the Fourth Amendment protect individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the police? When are there exceptio
sammy [17]

INTERESTS PROTECTED

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." The ultimate goal of this provision is to protect people’s right to privacy and freedom from unreasonable intrusions by the government. However, the Fourth Amendment does not guarantee protection from all searches and seizures, but only those done by the government and deemed unreasonable under the law. To claim violation of Fourth Amendment as the basis for suppressing a relevant evidence, the court had long required that the claimant must prove that he himself was the victim of an invasion of privacy to have a valid standing to claim protection under the Fourth Amendment. However, the Supreme Court has departed from such requirement, issue of exclusion is to be determined solely upon a resolution of the substantive question whether the claimant's Fourth Amendment rights have been violated, which in turn requires that the claimant demonstrates a justifiable expectation of privacy, which was arbitrarily violated by the government. In general, most warrantless searches of private premises are prohibited under the Fourth Amendment, unless specific exception applies. For instance, a warrantless search may be lawful, if an officer has asked and is given consent to search; if the search is incident to a lawful arrest; if there is probable cause to search and there is exigent circumstance calling for the warrantless search. Exigent circumstances exist in situations where a situation where people are in imminent danger, where evidence faces imminent destruction, or prior to a suspect's imminent escape. On the other hand, warrantless search and seizure of properties are not illegal, if the objects being searched are in plain view. Further, warrantless seizure of abandoned property, or of properties on an open field do not violate Fourth Amendment, because it is considered that having expectation of privacy right to an abandoned property or to properties on an open field is not reasonable. However, in some states, there are some exception to this limitation, where some state authorities have granted protection to open fields. States can always establish higher standards for searches and seizures protection than what is required by the Fourth Amendment, but states cannot allow conducts that violate the Fourth Amendment. Where there was a violation of one’s fourth amendment rights by federal officials, A bivens action can be filed against federal law enforcement officials for damages, resulting from an unlawful search and seizure. Under the Bivens action, the claimant needs to prove that there has been a constitutional violation of the fourth amendment rights by federal officials acting under the color of law. However, the protection under the Fourth Amendment can be waived if one voluntarily consents to or does not object to evidence collected during a warrantless search or seizure.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, it is a felony for an auditor to willfully fail to maintain proper records of audits and w
    8·1 answer
  • 3 points
    7·1 answer
  • Who should determine if, and to what extent, a society is unjust?
    9·1 answer
  • Two key questions should be asked when analyzing the problem dimension. Which of the following are the correct questions?
    9·1 answer
  • How long is a representative's term of office?
    9·2 answers
  • .Which level of government regulates interstate commerce?
    14·2 answers
  • In most states, people charged with an infraction do not have the right to a trial by jury. Is the previous statement true or fa
    9·1 answer
  • Explain the following phrase “Experience in government is an unwritten but important qualification.”
    5·1 answer
  • In contrast to federal courts, state courts have what kind of jurisdiction?.
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT typically significant information that should be included in a residential listing agreement?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!