Mapp v. Ohio Case: Do you agree with the Court’s decision in the Mapp case? Give reasons for your answer.

Law

1 answer:

Aleksandr-060686 [28]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment. Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."

You might be interested in

According to the International Association of Chiefs of Police, GPS monitors can assist in court proceedings, case management pl

kipiarov [429]

Answer:

Re-register

Explanation:

GPS to help law enforcement recover stolen vehicles, there are many ways law enforcement agencies can implement GPS tracking to help prevent theft, stop crime, and catch criminals.

GPS tracking can also be used for tracking those under house arrest or for enforcing restraining orders. Convicted criminals serving time under house arrest can wear a tamper-resistant, GPS-enabled ankle cuff.

Some states have specific laws that allow judges and law enforcement to use technology in ways that are intended to protect victims of domestic violence. For example, law enforcement and courts can use Global Positioning Systems (GPS) technology to track offenders who have committed domestic violence and stalking.

8 0

3 years ago

The law of which country provided the roots for U.S. law?

Hoochie [10]

Answer:

Background. At both the federal and state levels, the law of the United States was mainly derived from the common law system of English law, which was in force at the time of the Revolutionary War. However, U.S. law has diverged greatly from its English ancestor both in terms of substance and procedure.

5 0

3 years ago

How sovereignty is another source of rule of law

Snezhnost [94]

Sovereignty is the supreme authority within a territory.In any state, sovereignty is assigned to the person, body, or institution that has the ultimate authority over other people in order to establish a law or change an existing law.In political theory, sovereignty is a substantive term designating supreme legitimate authority over some polity don’t mind the number I’m about to put 126

7 0

3 years ago

What is the best way to persuade your teachers.

Eddi Din [679]

Answer: Make them see that your trying hard and that, what ever your asking for, you truly want it. They’ll be more inclined to accept if they think your serious about it.

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Larger police departments tend to have?

sdas [7]

Answer:

more specialization than smaller departments

Explanation:

hope this helps -Cam♡

4 0

3 years ago