1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ksju [112]
3 years ago
9

Mapp v. Ohio Case: Do you agree with the Court’s decision in the Mapp case? Give reasons for your answer.

Law
1 answer:
Aleksandr-060686 [28]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment.  Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."

You might be interested in
Come join bro if you answer you get brainlyest
fredd [130]

Answer:

Answer

Explanation:

Explanation

3 0
4 years ago
Over time, the supreme court has been more restrictive in its protection of the right to privacy.
nexus9112 [7]

The Supreme Court has not become more restrictive in protecting the right to privacy, so this claim is false.

We can arrive at this answer because:

  • The Supreme Court understood that the right to privacy is essential to protect citizens, especially those involved in marginalized situations.
  • For this reason, the Supreme Court decided to expand the privacy rights and not restrict them as shown in the question above.

This supreme court attitude is intended to promote greater protection for individuals who are marginalized and who may suffer intolerant and life-threatening attacks.

More information:

brainly.com/question/1145825?referrer=searchResults

8 0
3 years ago
My brother is gay what is his name
Olenka [21]

Answer: ummm

Explanation: Ted, Bob Armstrong, or Gay dude

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The concept of the "selective incorporation" supports which of the following principles of government?
tresset_1 [31]

Answer:

the answer is rule of law.

Explanation:

Selective Incorporation can be defined as the law that has been laid down which prevents state government from creating or making laws that can affect or withdraw the rights of citizens or people in America.

4 0
2 years ago
Provide two examples of real-life instances where you engaged in an error in reasoning and, as a result, came to a faulty conclu
Molodets [167]

Two examples of real-life instances where a person might engage in an error in reasoning and, as a result, come to a faulty conclusion about something that they observed are:

1. Concluding that a person is harsh because his face is not cheerful.

2. Predicting that it will rain because the weather is gloomy.

<h3>What is a Faulty Conclusion?</h3>

A faulty conclusion is reached when the pattern of reasoning is faulty. Before a conclusion can be reached on a matter, it is vital to test the observations beyond all reasonable doubts.

If this is not done, the probability of reaching a faulty conclusion will be high.

Learn more about faulty conclusions here:

brainly.com/question/2141635

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Are the american wolfdogs legal in los angeles​
    15·2 answers
  • "which is a bill that is introduced in both chambers of congress at the same time"
    5·1 answer
  • Roland carries out various responsibilities as a part of the US police force. He is in charge of patrolling and important invest
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these action would be protected by the first amendment
    8·2 answers
  • What was the court's majority opinion in Plessy v. Ferguson?<br><br> On Plato
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a leakage?
    12·2 answers
  • The importance and benefit of the 'rule of law' as a democratic principle which supports a democracy
    8·1 answer
  • Explain the Law
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT typically significant information that should be included in a residential listing agreement?
    7·1 answer
  • The only way a person can be released from prison is to serve their entire sentence.
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!