1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ksju [112]
2 years ago
9

Mapp v. Ohio Case: Do you agree with the Court’s decision in the Mapp case? Give reasons for your answer.

Law
1 answer:
Aleksandr-060686 [28]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment.  Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."

You might be interested in
A county governed by a central party is best characterized as
liubo4ka [24]
A:communist hope this helps :)
6 0
3 years ago
Which statement about cells is false?
Mashcka [7]

Answer:

D)Cells contribute only to the reproduction of an organism

Explanation:

Cells do many different things and do not only limit to reproduction of an organism

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Porque febo nunca podía darle un abrazo una caricia su hijo​
alexira [117]

because febo could never give a hug a caress his son

4 0
3 years ago
How can executive orders have a positive and negative impact on the country ?
lapo4ka [179]

Answer:

Executive Orders are quick and doesn't require congress, it can be a temporary fix, to problems, but is limited, The Negative impact is that is could be a Federal Over reach in terms of power, and could cause confusion, and fight with State or other Federal Laws.

4 0
3 years ago
2. What is a possible consequence for failing to investigate a report of unprofessional
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

Answer:

a. Warning by the human resources department

hope this helps :)

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 8. What is the process of identifying psychological and social characteristics surrounding the crime as well as the manner in wh
    15·2 answers
  • Having a broken tail light<br> A. Moving Violation<br><br> B. Non-Moving Violation
    8·2 answers
  • I need help with this write about the 5 questions
    13·2 answers
  • Assume that you are planning to start your own day care center. You will need to consider many aspects, such as legal, technical
    5·2 answers
  • DON'T ANSWER THIS! (You can answer AFTER 201600823 answers! She is my sis!)
    7·2 answers
  • Andrew wants to become a certified forensic pathologist. What is MOST likely to be true about his path to achieve this goal?
    5·2 answers
  • Why are private businesses simpler to operate than public companies?
    15·1 answer
  • This one of my favriot memes, whats yours?
    13·2 answers
  • _______________ is a rule in tort law, used in the majority of states, that reduces the plaintiff's recovery in proportion to th
    14·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of the fair credit billing act and the electronic fund transfer act.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!