Mapp v. Ohio Case: Do you agree with the Court’s decision in the Mapp case? Give reasons for your answer.

Law

1 answer:

Aleksandr-060686 [28]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment. Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."

You might be interested in

What should you do when making a personal appeal to a procrastinator to change his/her work habits? A. Use examples of how you w

blagie [28]

The answer is A

Hope this helped :)

8 0

2 years ago

Imagine Joe calls the police from his smart phone to report a crime he could see from his house. While he’s on the phone with th

Mazyrski [523]

If the police had no warrant saying they could go in or search Joe's house then the police could be in a certain amount of trouble as well seeing as Joe did not willingly let them in and they never had a warrant but Joe could be in a lot more trouble for being in the possession of drugs.

And smart homes should be more advanced to these kinds of things because they could have been fake cops, plus they had no warrant which leaves everyone in this situation at fault especially Joe for being in the possession of drugs and the possible false 911 call influenced on drugs either making him see things or think things, maybe even both.

3 0

2 years ago

A water pipe bursts, flooding a General Business Company (GBC) utility room and tripping the circuit breakers on a panel in the

stealth61 [152]

Answer:

As a licensed electrician of 10 years Hal should be aware of the risks associated with his job. Now, I'll tell you of all of the mistakes and unnecessary risks that made by Hal. First, seeing a there was no mention of a plumber, I'm going to assume that the utility room is still flooded. If it is not still flooded then ignore this and move on to my next point, but if it is then I would just like to say that as a man with 10 years of experience, he should be aware of the fact that water conducts electricity. Second, even if the electrocution didn't involve the water, as a professional he should be competent enough to wear proper safety equipment. And finally, if I was GBC I would hire another electrician to point out every mistake made and how the entire thing could have been avoided if Hal hadn't decided to cut corners.

I hope that helps! :)

8 0

2 years ago

Which function of government do you think is most important. Explain

vekshin1

Answer: Assuming international recognition and relative peace, the most important function of government are ensure public order and provide means for conflict solving. The other functions can be covered by people or the private sector (how effectively is a question that remains unanswered) but only the State should have an army or a police force and only the state can provide for a legal system and a political system in the national level.

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

True or False? A lot of points to you if you answer correctly.

slamgirl [31]

False.
I’m pretty sure I’m right
Hope I helped :)
And please mark brainilest when u get the chance

8 0

3 years ago