Answer:
The statement which is the best argument against Social Darwinism is:
B. A good work ethic can eliminate a lot of the disadvantages of poverty.
Explanation:
Social Darwinism is a philosophy that incorporates notions taken from Darwinism, applying them to sciences such as sociology and economics. As we know, <u>Darwinism is based on the idea of "survival of the fittest". Therefore, Social Darwinism explains differences in status, wealth, and success by stating that those who have those things are better than those who do not. In other words, if someone is poor or unsuccessful, that means that person is not "evolved" enough.</u>
The problem with Social Darwinism is that is justifies discrimination and imperialism. It places the blame on those who are actually suffering the consequences of a broken and unfair system. With that in mind, we can easily eliminate options A and C, since they agree with Social Darwinism. Option D can also be eliminated because it merely states a fact that is true, but does not refute Social Darwinism.<u> Letter B is the best option. It argues that there is a way to eliminate many of the disadvantages, that is, it shows the problem with the system, refuting Social Darwinism.</u>
True. This is called Social Adaptation. There are certain norms and standards that are accepted in different forms of societies found all over the world. This is why there are unique personalities and traits that are developed in each individual because their external environment is a huge factor in their growth.
Answer:
Positive role models are a ray of sunshine in one's life. They inspire when a person is going through the dark phase of the his/her life.They make efforts to become like their positive role model. But if an individual's role model is negative one would adopt bad or ludicrous ways in life leading to a criminal life.
Pedro de Alvarado, he massacred Aztec chiefs and caused the Aztecs to revolt.
