1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
puteri [66]
3 years ago
12

Should law enforcement officials be required to get a search warrant before they are allowed to use new technology to track the

location of a criminal suspect (unbeknownst to him) through his cell phone
Law
2 answers:
N76 [4]3 years ago
5 0
Yes, Fourth Amendment makes this illegal they will need a warrant for it.
blagie [28]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Legally, yes. The fourth amendment is the closest we have to answer this question, and it regards search and seizure. Anything found through the use of technology could be considered inadmissible.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Select the correct answer.
erastova [34]
Physiology of an individual.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In criminal trials, the defense calls its witnesses first.<br> True<br> False
34kurt

Answer:

False.

The defense <em>does not</em><em> </em>call its witnesses first.

<em>I hope this helped at all.</em>

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is an executive agreement
ahrayia [7]

Answer1:an international agreement, usually regarding routine administrative matters not warranting a formal treaty, made by the executive branch of the US government without ratification by the Senate Answer2: An executive agreement is an agreement between the heads of government of two or more nations that has not been ratified by the legislature as treaties are ratified. Executive agreements are considered politically binding to distinguish them from treaties which are legally binding

4 0
3 years ago
What are some possible negative issues with the M'Naghter Rule? Select all that apply.
koban [17]

Answer:

A. Fails to distinguish between violent defendants and one that no longer pose a danger to society.

C. Fails to differentiate between mental illness that are temporary or lifelong conditions.

Explanation:

M'Naghten Rule is an insanity defense used by defendant's attorney to plead defendant not guilty of crime due to mental conditions suffered during the time crime committed.

M'Naghten Rule states that a defendant will be pleaded not guilty only under conditions when it will be proved that the mental condition of defendant was not right at the time when crime was committed and that he/she was not able to discern his/her actions as right or wrong.

The criticism received to the M'Naghten rule is that it fails to distinguish between defendants who pose threat to the society and those who do not pose threat any longer. Another criticism is that it fails to distinguish between mental illness that are temporary or conditions which are lifelong.

Therefore, option A and C are correct.

6 0
2 years ago
HELP PLEASE I DONT NOW WHAT IT IS
zavuch27 [327]

Answer:

Maybe c) is the answer cuz they didn't take any action regarding this issue

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP ME QUICK!!!
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following is illegal in Florida?
    15·2 answers
  • What is the quadratic formuala. of math and englsih
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following developments during the 1780s produced the STRONGEST calls for a new national constitution and government
    5·1 answer
  • What are reasons to vote ? What are reasons not to vote?
    7·1 answer
  • Por que los derechos humanos son imprescriptibles​
    9·1 answer
  • HELP PLEAE<br><br> HOW PLAY AMOG US111
    9·2 answers
  • 1. Bicycle riders must:
    7·1 answer
  • Which early US
    15·1 answer
  • What is the relationship between the
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!