In this scenario, Blue Tech Inc.'s failure can be best attributed to <u>"Time compression diseconomies."</u>
We accept time compression diseconomies where the snappier a firm builds up the asset, the higher the improvement cost. We demonstrate that time compression diseconomies normally offer ascent to asset heterogeneity and henceforth upper hand in that one firm builds up the asset quicker than the other. We evaluate the supportability of the upper hand, determine conditions
under which the asset is "incomparable" and demonstrate that firm benefits are nonmonotonic in the degree of time compression diseconomies.
Answer:
im sorryi wish i was good at math
Explanation:
im failing math btw
The Right Response is Option C which is Long Term Changes in the Economy.
<h3><u>
Why Did Friedman Argued So?</u></h3>
- The concept of monetarism, which refers to the management of money in the economy, was developed by Milton Friedman. According to Friedman, changes in the money supply can have both long- and short-term consequences.
Friedman suggested that long-term changes in the economy had an impact on consumer behavior. Long-term economic developments have an impact on how consumers behave while making purchases. For instance, if long-term economic trends are favorable, consumer spending will rise; otherwise, it would fall.
Therefore, "long-term changes in the economy" is the right response.
To learn more about Long Term Changes in the Economy. Click the links.
brainly.com/question/20822981
#SPJ4
Correct Question - Milton Friedman argued that consumers are more likely to alter their behavior based on
a) changes in the unemployment rate.
b) short-term changes in the economy.
c) long-term changes in the economy.
d) changes in the inflation rate.
Answer:
ukrskyrstluustliltdild5id
5i
d5dtij
dttid
idt
iltddtlilitdild5itlditdlidltdt
idt
it
iddt
iiltditdlditlidtdt
iitldtdi
ditlidltdlit
Explanation:
uktstliutlss5i
5id
il6rrip6
6ro
6ridli6dil5d6
it
did
tidi
5dti
di
tdid
tdi
tid
i
tdoyd
id
ttid
tidl.idtltddit
tdi
dti
tid
idt
itd
dtdi
idt
it.dlitrkutdkutdutdludltudlitd
itofyyo
f
foy
rti
fo6dti6r96r
9
97r7r0
6r9
r96
9
goofy 0r
said
Answer:
<u>Current Ratio = 2; Yes</u>
Explanation:
First, to solve for current ratio, simply divide the current assets by the current liabilities.
So the current ratio would be $30,000 / $15,000 resulting to <em><u>2</u></em>
Now, a current ratio greater than one means that <u>Mister Ribs will be able to pay its current liabilities as they come due in the next year.</u>
However, because the current ratio at any one time is just a snapshot, it is usually not a complete representation of a company’s liquidity or solvency.
