Researching with human participants (independently of their particularities, such as those mentioned) is regulated by the U.S. Federal regulations named “Common Rule Layout,” federally funded research using humans also need review by an IRB of the institution conducting the research.
They establish in chapter III “Standards and guidance for members of the research ethics committees, incise 3: “Selection of study population and recruitment of research participants Ethically acceptable research ensures that no group or class of persons bears more than its fair share of the burdens of participation in research. Similarly, no group should be deprived of its fair share of the benefits of research; these benefits include the direct benefits of participation (if any) as well as the new knowledge that the research is designed to yield. Thus, one question for research ethics review to consider is whether the population that will bear the risks of participating in the research is likely to benefit from the knowledge derived from the research. Also, ethically acceptable research includes recruitment strategies that are balanced and objectively describe the purpose of the research, the risks and potential benefits of participating in the research, and other relevant details” (p.13)
The document: “Preg45CFR 46, Subpart B: Additional Protections for Pregnant Women, Human Fetuses and Neonates Involved in Research”, indeed specifies in detail those requirements also necessary to research with these groups. If determined research reviewed by the IRB as previously mentioned (even when women, minors, persons kept in detention and unborn fetuses are all considered vulnerable research participants) meet the requirements for the research, as specified elsewhere.
Therefore, the correct answer is A) the research can be authorized if the requirements for subpart b, additional protections for pregnant women, human fetuses and neonates involved in research are met because subpart b takes precedence over subpart d. The requirements of subparts a, b, c, and d are met.
The answer is: Emotional wellness
Emotional wellness refers to your ability to maintain the stability of your feeling, handling your stress level, and enjoying your life.
While economic factor usually play an important role in maintaining our overall wellness, emotional wellness tend to be influenced more by our social interaction.
In Sara's case, she has only two option to improve her emotional wellness.:
- The first option is to sacrifice the time that she spent for her education and allocate it to socialize with her friends. (the downside of this option is that her education result could be worsened)
- The second option is to find new people that currently pursue the same thing with her. So rather than sacrificing the time she put for education, she can find a friend that can be an emotional support for her while she focus on her education/career..
The answer is "they may experience empty nest syndrome".
Empty nest syndrome refers to a feeling of grief and dejection guardians may feel when their kids leave home out of the blue, for example, to live without anyone else or to go to a school or college. It's anything but a clinical condition.
Answer: Building canals and roads improved transportation, which helped strengthen the nation’s trade and economy. Protecting US goods by increasing the tariff on foreign goods strengthened the US economy as well. The stronger economy helped to promote nationalism. Better transportation also created a sense of national unity by connecting Americans from different regions.
Explanation: This is the exact answer but if you would like to change it up so then it does not look like you looked the question up, it should benefit you a lot.
