Answer:
The quantity is likely to decrease, the change in price depends on the extent of change in demand and supply.
Explanation:
The fear of the mad cow disease lead to a reduction in the demand for beef. This caused the demand curve to move to the left.
At the same time, destruction of cattle heads ordered by the government lead to a reduction in the supply of beef. This caused the supply curve to move to the left.
This leftward shift in both demand as well as supply curve will lead to a reduction in the equilibrium quantity of beef.
The change in price of beef depends upon the extent of change in demand and supply. If both decrease by the same extent, the price will remain the same.
A minimum wage can purpose advantage and disadvantage price-push inflation.elevating wages reduces expensive employee turnover and will increase productivity.
Elevating the federal minimal wage to an hour is a coverage purpose for many lawmakers. growing the minimal salary is expected to lift people out of poverty and enhance work ethic, however, it also comes with many feasible negative implications, which include inflation and a loss of jobs.Elevating the federal minimal wage may even stimulate customer spending, help corporations' bottom lines, and grow the financial system it might additionally raise the overall financial system by using producing extended patron demand.
Elevating wages reduces expensive employee turnover and will increase productivity. while the minimal salary is going up, employers can obtain such benefits without being positioned at a competitive disadvantage, because all groups of their field are required to do the identical.
A minimum wage can purpose price-push inflation. this is because corporations face an growth in charges that are in all likelihood to be passed on to clients. that is even more likely if wage differentials are maintained.
Learn more about wage here:-brainly.com/question/26699459
#SPJ4
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
B. They should be more willing to tear down the $50 million stadium, because it cost more to build.
C. The cost to build the old stadium shouldn’t be considered.
And this is the correct answer:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
Explanation:
City A will likely be more willing to tear down its old stadium because it costed $5 million to build. City B, on the other hand, will have to think twice because a stadium that costed $50 billion to build could have more value than it seems, or the City could simply not have enough money to build a better new stadium (something that would probably cost more than $50 billion to do).
Answer:
The cash award will be equal;l to $444422.01
Explanation:
We have given amount invested P = $440000
Rate of interest r = 8.3%
Time t = 1 year
As the amount is compounded on daily basis
We know that 1 year = 365 days
So rate of interest 
%
Time period n = 365
We know that final amount is equal to 
So 
$
So the cash award will be equal;l to $444422.01
