This question asks for an essay, which is a personal task that we cannot provide here. However, we can still develop some ideas that might help you in your work.
The House of Representatives can be considered both the people's branch and the insiders' branch. However, there is no question that the institution is now a lot more restrictive and less connected to the people than it was when the Framers designed it. Therefore, I would argue that it has become an insiders' branch.
First, legislators do not listen to constituents all the time. This is because each legislators has an enormous amount of constituents, all of which have very different characteristics. Moreover, legislators need to reconcile the interests of their constituents with those of other groups.
Second, the policymaking process makes it difficult for the public to monitor and evaluate the House. This is because common people do not have access to the necessary information to make this possible. Moreover, the process is long and complicated, and cannot be easily understood by all people.
Finally, partisan gerrymandering and polarization means that certain groups of constituents are much more important to a politician's career and support than others. This includes constituents in swing states, or constituents who support a particular party. Therefore, these constituents might see their interests represented more often than others.
All of the given options would shift aggregate demand to the right by more than the increase in expenditures.
Answer: Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
When an economy is at rest than the state is termed as equilibrium but multiplier effect is seen when primary variation in collective demand can have bigger impact on equilibrium level of national income.
Multiplier effect is of two type positive (when primary hike in an injection result into greater final hike in real GDP) and negative (when primary decline in an injection result into greater final decline in real GDP). Here all the options can shift the aggregate demand to the right by more than increase in expenditure and show positive multiplier effect.
The Belmont Report...
This is not the Belmont principle of justice, please resubmit your question clearly so that we may understand better how to answer your question and ensure we are giving you what you need.
Answer:
A. beliefs and positions on political issues.
Answer:
Reverend J. A. DeLaine was the south Carolinian that spoke out against integrating public schools in South Carolina
Explanation:
At a certain period of time, most public schools in American states were hit by heavy racial segregation against the African Americans. These manifested in various forms ranging from poor supply of facilities and inadequate maintenance to use of old textbooks and learning resources that were discarded by schools with white children.
Many teachers and citizens fought hard to end this injustice through writing petitions and several other legal actions, some of them who lost their job in the process. A prominent personality in the fight against racial segregation in South Carolina was Reverend J. A. DeLaine. He was a teacher, a community religious leader and also a board member of the NAACP
Finally, in 1954, school segregation was termed unconstitutional by the Supreme court
