The PHS regulations about financial conflict of interest require INVESTIGATORS to disclose significant financial conflict of interest.
The PHS requires that for each proposal submitted to that agency, the principal investigator and any other person regardless of their positions and titles, who are responsible for the conduct and the design of the experiment should certify that appropriate significant financial disclosure has been made.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
The federal reserve systems responsibilities include influencing the supply of money and credit to banks
Answer:
Explicit costs - $51,000
Explicit costs are those for which a person incurs in actual spending of money. In this case, Christine had to pay $15,000 in wages, and $36,000 in rent ($3,000 x 12). These are expenses that she had to pay money for, and that had to be accounted for in the accounting books, and in the financial statements. These are in other words, explicit costs.
Implicit costs - $40,000
Implicit costs are simply the opportunity costs. An opportunity cost is the cost of the next more valuable alternative when faced with two or more options. No money is paid for this costs. The implicit costs for Christine were the $40,000 that she not receive as wages if she had continued working at a real state firm.
Answer:
The total shareholders’ equity at the end of Year 1 is $487,400
Explanation:
The computation of the ending total shareholders’ equity is shown below:
= Common stock value in exchange of cash + net income + net holding gains - dividend paid
= $442,400 + $98,000 + $1,000 - $54,000
= $487,400
While calculating the ending balance of shareholder equity we added the net income, net holding gains and deducted the dividend paid to the common stock value amount
Answer:
The fraud was discovered Option D: The operations manager found a check made payable to Phillips while searching Phillips' desk for some accounting records.
Explanation:
In the given case study, Ernie Phillips had got a job as a 'controller'. He had started writing checks to himself other than the payroll checks.
This fraud can be discovered when the operations manager found a check on Phillips desk which was payable to himself and it was other than the payroll check. Thus, Option D is the statement as an answer.
Cancelled checks do not have to do anything with the fraud, as per Option A, because cancelled checks are never cleared in the bank. The receiver doesn't usually receive a call before check clearance. So, Option B is also incorrect. No error was there in the check as stated in Option C.
