1. <span>popular sovereignty, limited government, separation of powers, checks and balances, judicial review, and federalism.
2. </span><span>Under federalism, power is divided between national and state governments. Both levels have their own agencies and officials, and pass laws that directly affect citizens. This was devised because the people were afraid to give all the power to a central government, federalism offered a middle ground on the subject. Montesquieu believed in a separation of powers consisting of three branches, the federal government consisting of a legislative, executive and judicial branch. Each philosophy further separated the power of the federal government, making it so that each branch keeps the other in check, as with each citizen keeping the government under check. Montesquieu balanced the branches, the separation of powers balanced the government.
3. </span><span>a system that allows each branch of a government to amend or veto acts of another branch so as to prevent any one branch from exerting too much power.
</span><span>6. consitiutional amendment or new law</span>
Overall, these areas contributed to his downfall, ... Napoleon was clearly one of the most outstanding military commanders of the .... MacLachlan states, “It is evident that Napoleon lost his Empire in 1814 due to personal .... his career and although it was not always a fatal flaw it often times had disastrous.
Answer:
#1. The treaty of Paris
#2. Pushed Natives further west
Explanation:
#1. The war provided Great Britian enormous territorial gains in North America, but disputes over subsequent frontier policy and paying the wars expenses led to colonial discontent, and ultimately to the American Revolution.
#2. With Britain in control, Native Americans in Ohio feared the colonists would move into their lands, driving the Native further west as had occurred since the earliest British Settlements in North America.
The correct answer is C) Rome, because Roman law forces the accuser to have a burden of proof.
Based on what happens to Citizen X, he lives under the government of Rome.
When we are talking about the term Burden of Proof it means the accuser has to prove his claims. So, in simpler terms, it’s the obligation of the accuser to present the elements that support his claim. In the case of the example, Citizen X lives in Rome because he has to present the proofs that his co-worker stole the watch. There were no proofs, then, the co-worker was found not-guilty in the absence of proofs.
