Plugging in for the Earth's mass and for G, we have 11.2 km/s for the escape velocity for an object launched from the Earth's surface. This is about 25,000 miles per hour
<span>The correct option is C. Energy cannot be created or destroyed. This statement is known as law of conservation of energy, and it implies that whenever a certain form of energy does change, the loss of this form of energy must have converted into an another type of energy. A typical example is an object falling to the ground: initially, the object has gravitational potential energy. As the object falls down, it loses potential energy (since its altitude from the grounf decreases), but it acquires kinetic energy (because its velocity increases). In this example, potential energy has converted into kinetic energy, but the total energy of the object has remained constant.</span>
Answer:
Area = 20 m²
Explanation:
Given the following data;
Force = 2500 N
Pressure = 125 Pa
To find the area on which it rest;
Mathematically, pressure is given by the formula;
Making area the subject of formula, we have;
Substituting into the formula, we have;
Area = 20 m²
Answer:
N = 3.54 * 10²³ atoms
Explanation:
The formula to apply here is the idea gas law;
PV = nRT where ;
P= pressure of the gas= 1.013 * 10⁵ Pa
V= volume of the gas = 4/3 * 3.14 *0.15³= 0.01414 m³
n= amount of a substance = ?
R= ideal gas constant= 8.314
T= temperature= 293 K
Applying the values to the formula;
PV = nRT
1.013 * 10⁵ * 0.01414 = n * 8.314*293
n= 1.013 * 10⁵ * 0.01414 / 8.314*293
n= 0.588 moles
1 mole = 6.022 * 10²⁷ atoms/ mole
0.588 moles = 0.588 * 6.022 * 10²⁷
N = 3.54 * 10²³ atoms
This question is a very good one indeed! I am very happy you asked it. I would first like to say that, although energy is important, our planet is more so. That is why I feel like we should always try to explore ideas that are both useful to the human race but also useful in protecting our environment because what is the use in having energy if we will not be able to use it. That is why I feel that we should try at types of energy like solar and wind. The problem is finding ways that are less expensive and more efficient. For example, creating a wind energy system that creates a sizeable about of energy and also is not too expensive and hard to make like the wind turbines of nowadays. Also what comes into question is the effect of these ideas and I feel that although some of these may have harmful effects, they must be used. One thing though is that I do not agree in expanding on our oil and gas exploration because it has so many bad effects to our environment that it is hardly worth it. If we can find alternatives in these other sources, like many states in the USA are trying to do, then we will be able to move much faster in technology and also help protect our lovely planet.
