<u>Explanation:</u>
a) First, note that the Type I error refers to a situation where the null hypothesis is rejected when it is actually true. Hence, her null hypothesis would be H0: mean daily demand of her clothes in this region should be greater than or equal to 100.
The implication of Type I error in this case is that Mary <u>rejects</u> that the mean daily demand of her clothes in this region is greater than or equal to 100 when it is actually true.
b) While, the Type II error, in this case, is a situation where Mary accepts the null hypothesis when it is actually false. That is, Mary <u>accepts</u> that the mean daily demand of her clothes in this region is greater than or equal to 100 when it is actually false.
c) The Type I error would be important to Mary because it shows that she'll be having a greater demand (which = more sales) for her products despite erroneously thinking otherwise.
Answer:
c = 6
Step-by-step explanation:
(I'm going to call the unidentified inner angle Henry, 'kay?)
First, we need to find Henry.
64 + Henry = 180
(64 - 64) + Henry = (180 - 64)
Henry = 116
Now to c.
Henry + 32 + 5c + 2 = 180
(116 + 32 + 2) + 5c = 180
(150 - 150) + 5c = (180 - 150)
5c/5 = 30/5
c = 6
Answer:
The new volume is 1/343 of the old volume or the ratio of the new volume to the old volume is 1 to 343
Step-by-step explanation:
In this question, we are asked to state the effect of multiplying the radius of a sphere by 1/7 on the volume.
Mathematically, the volume of a sphere V can be calculated using the formula
V = 4/3 * π * r^3
Now multiplying the radius by 1/7, the new radius will be r/7
Thus the new volume here will be
V2 = 4/3 * π * (r/7)^3
V2 = 4/3 * π * (r^3)/343
Thus we can conclude that the value of the volume will be decreased by a factor of 343
Meaning the ratio of the old volume to the new volume will be 1 to 343
Answer:
Last answer choice
Step-by-step explanation:
The AAS congruence theorem uses two adjacent angles, followed by a side length on the side (not in between the angles.) Therefore, the first answer is ruled out (because it deals with angles and not sides), and the second answer is ruled out because it involves side lengths between angles. LP=MO may be true, but it does not compare the two triangles that we are interested in. However, the last answer choice is correct, because a midpoint divides a line exactly in half, meaning that both halves are the same length and therefore congruent. Therefore, the last answer choice is correct. Hope this helps!
Answer:
Author is the correct answer
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope you have a great day :)
