The correct answer is it was never really defined
Although George H. W. Bush talked about it and how it was a new era of politics, it was never precisely defined as to what it stands for or what it would deal with or what the order would even be. It was a catchy phrase inspired by various events from the world but what it would be was never truly known or described.
There are several ways in which being nonaligned would have offered an advantage and disadvantage to a developing nation during the Cold War, but in general they would have been able to trade with both sides.
Answer:
Texas is a very large state and may have ruined the balance between slave and free state
Explanation:
Texas would be under the line for slave states and since Texas was a massive state, the north feared that the south would gain an upper hand in the conflict between slave and free state. Eventually Maine was created to fix this.
hope this helped
One major motivating factor in Britain's decision to colonize Australia in the late 1700s was "<span>B) Britain's recent loss of its American colonies," since it felt that the heart of its empire was beginning to slip away. </span>
They traded goods, They Farmed and made bricked house as well as making toys out of clay pottery
