Answer:
Hmmm, what would i recommand i think you Should learn skills and become innovative
Explanation:
Sir i'm gonna go toilet and come back
The answer to the question is true
Asyncronous is the answer I think
Answer: number 2 is the correct way to do it
Explanation:
Answer:
- def ending_time(hour, minutes, seconds, work_time):
- if((seconds + work_time) // 60 > 0):
- minutes = minutes + (seconds + work_time) // 60
- seconds = (seconds + work_time) % 60
-
- if(minutes // 60 > 0):
- hour = hour + (minutes // 60)
- minutes = minutes % 60
- else:
- seconds = seconds + work_time
-
- return str(hour) + ":" + str(minutes) + ":" + str(seconds)
-
- print(ending_time(2,30,59, 12000))
Explanation:
The solution code is written in Python 3.
Firstly create a function ending_time that takes the four required input parameters.
Next, create an if statement to check if the numerator of (seconds + work_times) divided by 60 is over zero. If so, increment the minute and reassign the remainder of the seconds to the variable (Line 2-4).
Next, create another if statement again to check if the numerator of (current minutes) divided by 60 is over zero, if so increment the hour and reassign the remainder of the minutes to the variable (Line 6-8)
Otherwise, just simply add the work_time to the current seconds
At last return the time output string (Line 12).
