Answer:
The answer to this question is $56.
Explanation:
In this question the consumption will initially increase by 56 because when we take 30 percent of the $100 it will give the $30. and when we less the money then the amount will be $70. after multiply the value by 0.8 it will give the 56.0. so the answer of the question is $56.
Example:
100*30/100=30
100-30=70
70*0.8=56.0.
I believe the answer is be please give me branliest answer
Answer:
Adverse selection of the wage cuts
Explanation:
Adverse selection of the wage cuts argument points that if the employer reacts to the poor business circumstances or conditions by reducing the wages for all the workers, then best workers, those with best employment alternatives at the other firms, are most likely to leave the organization. On the other hand, the least attractive workers, with the fewer employment alternatives at the other firms, are more likely to stay in the organization.
Thus, firms and organizations more likely to choose that which worker must be departed by means of firings and layoffs rather than cutting or trimming the wages across board.
I believe you don't I hope this helps
Answer:
The correct answer is <em>c. the CISG (Contracts for the International Sale of Goods).</em>
Explanation:
Any international convention signed by two or more countries must contemplate the internal laws of each of the signatory countries. The convention gives a more specific legal framework on the aspects contemplated therein but cannot contradict the legal principles and parameters of the signatory countries.
In the specific case of a convention on the exchange of goods between companies in the United States and Argentina, companies belonging to both countries must carry out their operations of buying and selling products according to the legal principles and parameters established in such regulations.
In the event that one of the companies or one of the National States understood that the requirements set forth in the convention are not being met, it must establish the legal claims before the agency that the convention would have arranged for the arbitration of such situation. This body could be an international court, a binational court, a court of a third country, a court belonging to one of both countries, etc.
An important dispute recently occurred between the Argentine State and Companies based in the United States over a Sovereign Debt issue. The North American companies owned debt bonds of the Argentine national State.
As in this case it had been previously signed that any dispute would be resolved in a New York court, so it happened and the Argentine government had to accept the opinion of Judge Griesa, of New York, paying off the debt and allowing the country to leave the default in which he was previously. This is a clear example of how to proceed in situations of international legal order based on the signing of a previous treaty.
