In positive punishment contingent removal of an aversive stimulus reduces the likelihood that the response will occur again in the future.
In negative punishment the contingent presentation of a stimulus reduces the likelihood the response will occur again in the future.
<h3>What do positive reinforcement and negative reinforcement have in common with each other?</h3>
- Punishment can be used in a positive or bad way, much like reinforcement.
- Any reinforcer, whether positive or negative, makes a behavioral response more likely.
- Positive or negative punishments both reduce the chance of a behavioral response.
<h3>What is reinforcement and its types?</h3>
- Everything that strengthens or improves a behavior qualifies as reinforcement.
- For instance, in a classroom context, forms of reinforcement may include praise, allowing pupils skip over unneeded assignments, or offering out small rewards like candy, extra downtime, or enjoyable hobbies.
<h3>What is positive and negative reinforcement and punishment?</h3>
- By including something desired, positive reinforcement improves the intended behavior (good).
- Aversive reinforcement reduces the goal behavior in positive punishment (bad).
- By removing an unpleasant stimulus, negative reinforcement makes the intended behavior more frequent.
Learn more about positive and negative reinforcement here:
brainly.com/question/2994390
#SPJ4
Answer:
The first presidential term started on March 4, 1789, the date set by the Congress of the Confederation for the beginning of operations of the federal government under the new U.S. Constitution. However, logistical delays prevented the actual start of the operations of the Executive Branch on that day.
Explanation:
Typically, federal capital sentencing process in the post-furman era involves four critical steps which include:
STEP 1: Sentencing
STEP 2: Direct Review
STEP 3: State Collateral Review
STEP 4: Federal Habeas Corpus
In many instances, the constitutionality of the death penalty has been challenged. Most of these constitutional challenges have included issues of race discrimination in the application of the death penalty.
Therefore, the process has not resolved the issue of racial disparities in death penalty sentencing on the federal level.
Answer:
a. an argument based on insufficient evidence
Explanation:
Answer:
Here is your answer hope it helps u have a great day ahead....