The government of the United States based on B. The Ten Commandments
<h3>Further explanation
</h3>
The Ten Commandments are Jews fundamental laws which tell the Jewish people how they should live. There are The Ten Commandments :
-
1. Do not worship any other gods. - Genesis 35:2 NIV: ‘Get rid of the foreign gods.’
- 2. Do not make any idols. - Genesis 31:30 NIV: Laban to Jacob: ‘But why did you steal my gods?’
- 3. Do not misuse the name of God. - Genesis 24:3 NIV: ‘I want you to swear by the Lord.’
- 4. Keep the Sabbath holy. - Genesis 2:3 NIV: ‘God blessed the seventh day and made it holy.’
- 5. Honor your father and mother. - Genesis 27:41 NIV: ‘The days of mourning my father are near.’
- 6. Do not murder. - Genesis 4:9 NIV: ‘Where is your brother Abel?’
- 7. Do not commit adultery. - Genesis 39:9: ‘How then could I do such a wicked thing and sin against God?’
- 8. Do not steal. - Genesis 44:4-7 NIV: ‘Why have you stolen my silver cup?’
- 9. Do not lie. - Genesis 39:17 NIV: ‘[Joseph] came to me to make sport of me but he ran.’
- 10. Do not covet. - Genesis 12:18; 20:3 NIV: ‘You are as good as dead because of the woman you have taken; she is a married woman.
There are lot of these claims that the United States is either a Christian nation or that it was founded on Judeo-Christian principles. Specifically, they claim quite often that our laws are based on the Ten Commandments.
<h3>Learn more</h3>
- Learn more about The Ten Commandments brainly.com/question/3170728
<h3>Answer details</h3>
Grade: 9
Subject: social studies
Chapter: the United States
Keywords: the United States
Answer:
I can't circle but it is adjustment knot . 60percent conform .
Answer:
Explanation:
The medieval period in India ended with the decline of the Mughal Empire. The modern period in India is generally regarded as having begun in the mid-18th century. This coincided with the British occupation of India.
mark me brainlest
Answer and Explanation:
1. Prosecutors may claim that the inaccurate report to which Rachel had access could induce misinterpretation on her part and that, in any case, Peter was already on the police for vandalism, which contributed to Rachel's conclusion. These justifications would not be successful, because Rachel had many ways to find out what actually happened to Peter.
2. Peter would sue Rachel for defamation and would likely succeed, as he has several witnesses that Rachel released incorrect information and that it affects his reputation.
3. The current malice is necessary in this case because Peter is a very well-known and popular person, and it is important that the current malice is inserted in the case, to speed up the process.
4. The fair report privilege can be used to protect Rachel, since the false information about Peter that she exposed, had as its only source a public document that induced her to publish the defamation.
The answer is A~ Transition
I too was looking for the answer and ran across your question and seen there was no answer, so when I ended up finding the answer I had to come back and give it to you :)