Answer:
is a template for organizing and understanding the consequences of job dissatisfaction.
Explanation:
From it's name, the EVLN tells us four ways that Employees respond when they are dissatisfied with their job.
E stands for Exit which means going elsewhere to look for other job opportunities, it means leaving the organization or transferring to another unit.
V stands for Voice which means trying to change the situation of things rather than escaping from that dissatisfying situation. It can be constructive or destructive.
L stands for Loyalty such Employees in this category respond to dissatisfaction by waiting patiently for the issue to be solved out with time or by other.
N stands for Neglect which means putting in less work, reducing quality and also acts of absenteeism and lateness.
The administration of upstream and downstream association's with providers and clients to convey better incentive at less cost than the inventory network all in all.
Answer:
Option (C) is correct.
Explanation:
In this situation, a firm will analyse the cost and benefits associated with the choice of installing the safety equipment or not.
Cost of installing the safety equipment is $5 per hour per employee
Hence, if the firm will pay $7 per hour less in the clean job than the wages paid to the employees in the dirty job then this will make the firm better off because the reduction in wages per hour per employee is greater than the cost of installing safety equipment per hour per employee.
Answer:
Lack of significant discounts in online shops
Lack of touch and feel of merchandise in online shopping
Delay in delivery
Lack of interactivity in online shopping
Lack of shopping experience
Lack of close examination in online shopping
Frauds in online shopping
Explanation:
Answer:
The conception of man as an economic animal is implied by the view that economic production is the determining “factor” or “sphere” of man or society. Against this conception can be put another, that of man as praxis. This takes account of man as a creative being, capable of realizing his freedom through his own activity. In this article the theory of the determining role of the “economic factor”, and the theory of factors in general have been examined. The economic interpretation of history, a variant of the theory of factors, has been acknowledged as partly true for the self‐alienated man and society, but the theory of factors in any variant has been found inadequate as a general theory of man, or society. The possibility of freedom cannot be reduced to the fact that the determining roles played by “factors”, vary, or to the hope that the economic “factor” can be subordinated to a “better” one. Man's freedom consists in his resolving the conflict of “factors”, and in realizing himself as an integral creative being, no longer split into independent and mutually opposed spheres.
Explanation:
that should help
