The loess or silt blown by wind makes up the soil of the Palouse hills region. Palouse is actually a region that is present in the northwestern part of the united states of America. it encompasses the huge area that includes the north and central Idaho and southeastern part of washington
Tinker vs. Des Moines dealt with students first amendment rights, New Jersey vs. TLO dealt with a students fourth amendment rights.
Tinker vs. Des Moines- This Supreme Court case was focused on a students first amendment right to freedom of speech in the school setting. Mary Beth Tinker and several of her friends/siblings wore black armbands with a peace symbol on them to protest the United States involvement in Vietnam. The students were punished for wearing the armbands. Tinker argued that this punishment violated her first amendment right of freedom of speech. Tinker ends up winning the decision in the Supreme Court.
New Jersey vs. TLO- TLO was a student accused of selling drugs in school. When the principal searched the students bag, there was a scale, list of names of people who owed the student money, and other evidence proving that TLO was indeed selling drugs in school. However, TLO argued that her 4th amendment rights were violated, as there was no warrant given by the principal. However, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the principal and said that administration does have the ability to search bags without a warrant.
Answer:
Explanation:Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court held that the Constitution of the United States was not meant to include American citizenship for black people, regardless of whether they were enslaved or free, and therefore the rights and privileges it confers upon American citizens could not apply to them. The decision was made in the case of Dred Scott, an enslaved black man whose owners had taken him from Missouri, which was a slave-holding state, into the Missouri Territory, most of which had been designated "free" territory by the Missouri Compromise of 1820. When his owners later brought him back to Missouri, Scott sued in court for his freedom, claiming that because he had been taken into "free" U.S. territory, he had automatically been freed, and was legally no longer a slave. Scott sued first in Missouri state court, which ruled that he was still a slave under its law. He then sued in U.S. federal court, which ruled against him by deciding that it had to apply Missouri law to the case. He then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Answer:
Taxation without representation. Oppression from Britain. Desire for independence and create their own laws. The intolerable acts. Etc.
Explanation:
Answer:
First answer is: Ended slavery
Second answer is: Citizenship
and the 3rd one is: Voting rights
Explanation:
Sorry for taking so long :)
